Posted on Leave a comment

Prices and user experience drive smartphone OS switching, poll suggests

 

There are countless reasons users may opt to jump from one mobile operating system to another, but the results of a recent poll suggest hardware pricing and user experience are key factors in making such decisions.

PCMag recently conducted a survey of 2,500 U.S. consumers to shed light on the mobile switcher phenomenon as it pertains to iOS and Android, the segment’s two dominant platforms.

Only 29 percent of respondents actually admitted to swapping sides, while the rest remained steadfast with their platform of choice. Interestingly, more traded in Android for iOS (18 percent) over those that went from iOS to Android (11 percent). Of those polled, 54 percent had an iPhone, while 27 percent had a Samsung handset running some flavor of Android.

According to the poll, 47 percent of those who moved to iOS (which comes to around 202 people) said they moved to iOS for a better user experience, while 30 percent of those switching to Android said the same thing. Android’s biggest benefit over iOS was cost, where 29 percent of those who went to Android cited the lower prices, presumably attached to hardware.

Source: PCMag.com

Other features were less compelling, including better features, better apps, better customer service, and faster software updates.

The survey included a few other bits of information, including the fact that 56 percent of those polled don’t care about the release of new smartphones, while 34 percent buy a new phone when their contract expires. Over half said they only replace their phone when it breaks.

Posted on Leave a comment

Facebook pulls Onavo Protect from App Store after Apple finds it violates privacy policy [u]

 

Facebook on Wednesday pulled its VPN service Onavo Protect from the iOS App Store after Apple found the app in violation of newly implemented privacy policies.

Citing sources familiar with the matter, The Wall Street Journal reports Apple earlier this month informed Facebook that Onavo Protect was in violation of App Store policies implemented in June.

Specifically, the software ran afoul of data collection restrictions and parts of the iPhone maker’s developer agreement covering customer data usage. Referring to the latter, Apple said Onavo Protect used data for purposes not directly related to app functionality or for serving up advertising to users.

Available as a free download, Onavo’s app allowed users to create a virtual private network that routes internet browser traffic to Facebook servers for filtering out malicious content. The app is advertised as a consumer protection tool that blocks “potentially harmful websites” and secures personal information when utilizing web browsers like Safari.

Onavo Protect’s FAQ webpage notes, “Onavo Protect blocks online threats when browsing the web using your iPhone or iPad. To function properly, you need to successfully install a profile during the first launch of the app, which in turns sets up a VPN on the device.”

More importantly for Facebook, Onavo granted free access to its users’ internet activity, invaluable information for firms keen on sniffing out consumer sentiment. According to The Journal, data from Onavo was used to bolster Facebook’s product and acquisition strategy, and helped inform industry moves including the purchase of WhatsApp and a venture into live video.

Representatives from Apple and Facebook discussed the privacy issue in a series of meetings last week, at least one of which was held at Apple Park, the report said. Upon Apple’s suggestion, Facebook agreed to pull Onavo Protect from the App Store.

“We work hard to protect user privacy and data security throughout the Apple ecosystem,” Apple said in a statement to TechCrunch. “With the latest update to our guidelines, we made it explicitly clear that apps should not collect information about which other apps are installed on a user’s device for the purposes of analytics or advertising/marketing and must make it clear what user data will be collected and how it will be used.”

The takedown does not affect users who already downloaded the app, which will continue to function normally. Due to the takedown, however, Facebook will be unable to push out updates for the title on iOS.

Onavo Protect remains available for Android via the Google Play Store.

Updated with statement from Apple.

Posted on Leave a comment

Apple CEO Tim Cook donates nearly $5M in company stock to charity

 

Apple CEO Tim Cook gifted 23,215 shares of directly owned company stock to an unidentified charity this week, an amount worth nearly $5 million at the end of trading on Tuesday.

Cook’s charitable donation was recorded in a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filing today. As no shares were sold, a reporting price was not applied to the transfer.

Apple stock finished the day at $215.04, meaning Cook’s gift, if converted today, would be worth $4,992,154.

While the destination of Cook’s donation is unknown — corporate leaders are obliged to disclose movement of owned shares, but are not required to publicly report a charitable transaction’s recipient — the executive has made similar gifts in the past. In 2015, Cook transferred 50,000 shares of owned company stock to an unspecified organization.

Including an acquisition of 166 shares on Jan. 31, the last effective day of Apple’s 2017 Amended Employee Stock Purchase Plan period, the CEO now 878,425 shares of beneficially owned Apple stock.

This week’s contribution is the latest in a string of donations from the Apple chief. In 2014, Cook donated a “substantial sum” to the Human Rights Campaign’s Project One America, which focuses on promoting LGBT rights in the U.S. South. That same year, he gave $291,791 to Pennsylvania’s Steel Valley School District, funds that were later used to purchase iPads for students and teachers.

In addition to direct donations, Cook has raised funds for the Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice & Human Rights by auctioning off one-on-one lunches through online service CharityBuzz. One such auction brought in $330,000 in 2014.

Despite amassing vast wealth as Apple’s top executive, Cook leads a relatively simple life that stand in contrast with other tech leaders who spend their fortunes on homes, yachts and planes. Indeed, Apple in 2017 mandated Cook use private jets for future travel, citing new security protocols.

Cook in 2015 said he plans to give a bulk of his money away to charity in what he called a “systematic approach” to philanthropy.

Posted on Leave a comment

What’s new in iOS 12 beta 9! Is this the final beta?

 

Video

Here we are, less than a week following iOS 12 beta eight with the ninth. This build has barely changed from what we’ve seen before, begging the question —will this be the final beta?

[embedded content]

This build —16A5362a —is only a couple removed from the last beta we received in the middle of last week.

That explains why there were no noticable visual changes and extremely similar performance to the last time around. In our tinkering, we saw buttery smooth animations and not a single dropped frame. With performance like this, and a small increment from the last, we would not be surprised if this was the last beta preceding the GM.

Check out what changed last time in betas 7 and 8.

Find any other changes? Reach out to us on Twitter @AppleInsider or @Andrew_OSU.

Posted on Leave a comment

Dutch Apple store evacuates after likely iPad battery incident

 

Apple’s Amsterdam store was briefly evacuated on Sunday afternoon following what appears to the overheating of an iPad battery.

Image Credit: AT5

Image Credit: AT5

After trouble began store staff immediately put the tablet in a bin with sand, which seemed to halt the situation, Dutch blog iCulture noted. By around 2:20 p.m. local time, the city’s fire department was on the scene. Though there was no obvious smoke, three people reported respiratory issues.

The incident moved quickly enough that by 3 p.m., workers and shoppers were allowed to come back in.

While normally safe, lithium-ion batteries are still volatile — they can potentially explode or catch fire if something like leakage isn’t dealt with immediately. This year alone Apple stores have seen multiple battery incidents/a>, including some fires.

This may be related to Apple’s discounted replacements, instituted to placate people upset about the company throttling iPhones with weakened batteries. While the company has since made it possible to toggle throttling, people with older iPhones have been flooding Apple stores looking to get battery replacements before they return to $79 from their current $29. More foot traffic may mean a higher likelihood of discovering faults.

Posted on Leave a comment

A year with Apple’s 5K iMac: Still the best Mac for your money

It’s been over a year since Apple refreshed its iMac lineup with updated hardware and added Thunderbolt 3. After long-term daily use of the computer in that period, now is probably a good time to reflect on the iMac, and how we feel about the machine a year after release.

[embedded content]

The iMac 5K has been AppleInsider’s main video editing machine since it was released. To make it more useful for the workload, we opted for the highest-specification model with 8 gigabytes of RAM and a 512-gigabyte SSD, a setup that was cheaper than the new top-spec i9 MacBook Pro released in July.

The iMac 5K is the only new Mac that allows you to easily add third-party RAM. Taking advantage of this, we added another 32 gigabytes, and now it is equipped with 40 gigabytes for only $3,000 —$300 less than the 32-gigabyte model from Apple.

The best comparison to make with it is against the iMac Pro, the next tier up in terms of specification. For $2,000 more in terms of cost, you’d get an 8-core processor, 32 gigabytes of RAM and 1 terabyte of SSD storage in the base model.

It may seem worth it to go with that over the iMac 5K because it should easily outperform the iMac 5K, right?

Initial thoughts

Before we get into performance testing, let’s discuss what we like and don’t like about the iMac 5K.

The design of the iMac 5K and iMac Pro is iconic and high quality, but it’s been 6 years since the last redesign, and the large chin is starting to look a bit dated. The 5K display, however, remains amazing, due to its high detail, brightness, and color accuracy.

We love the large amount of ports in the back, especially the Thunderbolt 3 ports, which we use to connect a 40TB storage area network device that can be accessed by two Macs at the same time, with the high bandwidth offered by Thunderbolt 3 providing very fast transfers to both desktops.

The keyboard and mouse supplied with the iMac are great, with few Bluetooth connection issues since buying it. The batteries stay charged for weeks, and they recharge incredibly quickly as well, which is handy since you have to flip the mouse over to do so.

Onto the internals, the 2017 iMac 5K switched over to Intel’s Kaby Lake processors, which added hardware acceleration for the HEVC codec, the current standard for 4K video streaming.

It also introduced desktop-class graphics chips for the first time in years, and even the cheaper Radeon Pro 570 is substantially faster than the best graphics options in older models from 2015.

Our iMac 5K has the Radeon Pro 580, which is actually the same graphics chip that came in the new Blackmagic eGPU, which is mostly marketed towards MacBook Pro users. We have previously compared the eGPU-equipped Core i9 2018 MacBook Pro with the 2017 5K iMac and the iMac Pro, and found that, even with the extra power of the eGPU, it isn’t enough to beat our iMac 5K.

Performance

Starting with Geekbench 4’s CPU test, the iMac 5K gets the best single-core score across the models we tested, but also the worst multi-core score, mainly due to the differences in the amount of cores. Under Geekbench 4’s graphics test, the iMac Pro is the clear winner.

In Cinebench R15, the iMac 5K is not far from the 2018 i9 MacBook Pro in its results, and that’s mostly because of the thermal design of the MacBook Pro. The iMac Pro simply destroyed both machines in the test.

We also looked at video gaming performance with Unigen’s Heaven Benchmark. The iMac Pro did extremely well here, and the iMac 5K easily did better than the MacBook Pro.

Onto the real world tests, the Lightroom export test showed the iMac 5K sits between the i9 MacBook Pro and the iMac Pro in the results.

The Final Cut Pro X video editing tests started with Bruce X, with the iMac 5K actually scoring incredibly close to the iMac Pro. A 20 second 4K clip stabilization test surprised us, as the iMac 5K was ahead of the other Mac systems by a huge amount.

The i9 MacBook Pro destroyed the iMac 5K in the HEVC to HEVC export test, even topping the iMac Pro, because the 8th-gen processor is using the latest QuickSync encoding and decoding technology. The iMac Pro’s Xeon CPU doesn’t have integrated graphics to enable QuickSync, but the raw power allows it to still get the job done quickly.

Moving on to a 5min 4K export, the iMac Pro was actually the slowest in this test, again due to the lack of QuickSync. The MacBook Pro was slower than the iMac 5K, due to the thermal throttling of the processor and the less powerful graphics.

For our Canon RAW 60 frames per second test, the iMac 5K was right behind the iMac Pro, while the MacBook Pro was extremely slow. We also tested timeline smoothness during this test, and the iMac Pro was the only one that played it back at the full 60 frames per second.

Overall, the top-spec i9 MacBook Pro performs worse than the 2017 iMac 5K in almost all of the tests we ran, which is completely unexpected based off the spec sheet.

We were also surprised at how close the iMac 5K performed compared to the iMac Pro, even beating it in some tests thanks to QuickSync.

The one-year opinion

After working in video editing full-time on the iMac 5K since it was released, I can tell you it’s really up to the job. I’ve used a top-spec 2016 15-inch MacBook Pro a few times, and it paled in comparison. We shoot and edit everything in 4K and perform a lot of stabilization, and since this processes almost twice as fast on this iMac 5K compared to the MacBook Pro, the time savings really add up throughout the day.

We export everything in 4K as well, which again is faster on the iMac 5K, so this machine really is the best bang for the buck for this particular situation.

On the negative side, the fans spin up and get loud when exporting longer 4K videos. I personally prefer using Google Chrome as a browser, and even with 40GB of RAM, the fans can sometimes kick up really loud when I’m researching and opening a bunch of tabs at once. This is more on Google than on Apple’s hardware, though.

Apple recently added HDR editing support to Final Cut Pro in the 10.14 update, but of course, there’s still no HDR display in any Mac device. This hints that Apple will either be working with a company like LG to bring us a new HDR display, or Apple will do it themselves in the next iMac or iMac Pro, or maybe even the rumored Apple Cinema Display, but that remains to be seen.

Overall, the 2017 top-spec iMac 5K is one of the best performing Macs ever made, and in our opinion, the best bang-for-your-buck Mac in terms of performance.

How to get the lowest price on Apple’s iMac 5K

Apple authorized resellers are currently discounting every iMac 5K by $80 to $200 thanks to instant rebates and/or coupon discounts. For the latest deals and up-to-date pricing, please visit the AppleInsider 2017 27-inch iMac 5K Price Guide.

Posted on Leave a comment

How to get more speed and features out of Safari on Mac and iOS

Maybe it’s just because it comes free on your Mac and iOS devices, but somehow it never seems fashionable to like Safari. Yet this is a remarkably capable app and it has hidden depths. AppleInsider delves into using Safari.

Safari doesn’t get enough credit as being a fast and capable browser, but that is partly it’s own fault. On iOS in particular, Safari gets out of your way so that you just see the website you want. You’re meant to forget that you’re using a browser at all and unfortunately that means you do tend to miss just how much Safari is doing for you —and what more it can do too.

Browsers are a matter of personal taste, so if you don’t like Safari, we’re not going to change your mind. Yet, we’re going to try and if you use any of them at all, these tips will show you just how much more power there is in this ubiquitous yet somehow also disregarded app.

Settings for this website (macOS)

Go to any website in Safari on the Mac and when it’s loaded, click on the Safari menu, then Settings for this website.

A drop-down dialog appears under the website’s address bar. It doesn’t have many options and they vary a little depending on the site but they are all handy to know.

There’s one marked Enable content blockers and this is one of macOS’s tools for battling the more intrusive of web ads. By default, it’s switched on and it’s hard to guess why you’d change that but you can.

You’re more likely to change a setting called Auto-Play. This is the tool that prevents a loud video playing when you first visit a site. By default, this is set to Stop Media with Sound which lets videos play but keeps them silent.

Instead, you can say you don’t even want the videos to play at all or you can go back to old days and have sound and video blasting out at you.

There are also options here for whether a site can use your location, your camera or your microphone. Each one is automatically set to require the site to ask you for permission but again you can apply a blanket allow or deny.

That’s a blanket permission for this site and this site alone. Similarly, on this same dialog you can choose Use Reader when available and that applies only to this website.

Use Reader view (macOS and iOS)

Reader or Reader View is when Safari attempts to strip away all of a website’s graphics and just display the text of the article you’re reading. It’s not always effective: you’ll find that sometimes text is missing from the article because of how the website has arranged its page.

Also, usually you want the graphics. Yet when a site is just so ferociously blinding with ads and popups and videos, being able to dismiss it all and get on with what you want to read is a boon.

On the Mac, you could use the same Settings for this website and Safari would remember to switch to Reader view every time you visited.

However, just click on the icon to the side of the website’s address —if there is one. The icon you need is a symbol showing four lines representing text but you won’t see it on the front or menu pages of a site. You have to go into an article first.

When you’re there, the icon appears and on the Mac you can click it to switch on Reader mode immediately. On iOS, you tap the same icon and get the same result.

What’s less commonly known is that this icon comes with more options. On the Mac, click and hold on it to get these extra settings and on iOS, press and hold for a moment.

On both platforms, the options you then get are to do with when Safari should automatically switch to Reader mode and when it shouldn’t. You can tell it that every single time you visit any page on the current site, Safari should switch on Reader. Or in the same place you can say that you want this to happen for every website ever.

Safari remembers this and if you change your mind, you click or tap and hold on that same Reader icon for a moment. Then the options are to automatically switch Reader off.

It’s not just about reading (macOS)

We may not like it when a video we weren’t expecting starts playing and we jump out of our seats. Yet the web is at least as much about video as it is text and Safari has ways to make watching better too.

As of macOS Sierra, you’ve been able to use Safari to watch Picture in Picture. It’s like being able to tear off a video from a site and drag it somewhere on your screen.

So you can keep a news channel running in one corner, for instance. Or if you’re watching a YouTube video about using some software, you can have that on screen next to the app.

For many websites including Vimeo, you find the video you want and start playing it. When it’s begun, there will typically be a Picture in Picture button on the bottom. Click that and your video pops out into this side panel: no website around it, no controls, just the video itself.

Unfortunately, not every site plays this nicely and that includes YouTube. For YouTube, you have to fiddle. Find a video, set it running and then right-click in the middle of the image. Ignore the menu that appears and instead right-click again.

Seriously. Right-click, then right-click again. The first time you do it you get a menu from YouTube but if you do it again immediately, you get a menu from Safari instead. Choose Enter Picture in Picture from that and you’re done.

Or nearly. Picture in Picture defaults to appearing in the top right of your display but you can move it —within limits. You can actually drag it anywhere and while you’re dragging, it will continue to play but then when you let go it will snap to the nearest corner.

You can resize it. Click on an edge and you can drag to increase the size to about a quarter of your screen or reduce it to a postage stamp. Unfortunately you can’t change the size and then restore it to the default unless you close the video and do it again.

To close it, move your cursor over the video image and you’ll get controls for pausing the video or popping it back into its website.

There’s no way to rewind or fast-forward and you can’t have more than one video playing Picture in Picture. That’s not even if you open a second tab or try to play videos from different sites.

Plus you do have to keep the original tab open. You can minimize it but the original tab or Safari window is also how you mute the sound of the video alone.

Extensions (macOS)

Arguably Google Chrome is famous for how you can download extensions that add various extra pieces of functionality for it but certainly Safari isn’t. Which is at least partly because there aren’t as many available —and possibly because there is an oddity in how Apple shows you them.

On the Mac, choose the Safari menu and then do not choose Safari Extensions. Instead, choose Preferences and click on the Extensions tab.

This is where you see what extensions you may already have and it’s where you uninstall or update them. There’s also a More Extensions button which takes you to Apple’s online store of these. That’s actually where the menu item Safari Extensions takes you so perhaps it’s useful the very first time you look at this.

It’s just that you don’t often go into your extensions so whenever you do, it is ridiculously easy to assume you want to choose the menu item with Extensions in its name.

These extensions really all make Safari automatically do something that you could already use it for in some automatic way. There’s an iThoughts extension that takes the current website’s address and adds it to a mind map in that application.

Or probably the most useful example of them all is the 1Password extension.

With this installed in Safari, you can tap a keystroke or click an icon and call up this password manager. It will pop passwords into place for you, it will quickly generate new ones, it will show you all your credit card details, or it will fill in forms.

The main 1Password app does all of this but the Safari Extension puts it all a keystroke away.

It’s all about speed

Safari is a fast browser. There, we’ve said it. Chrome and Firefox fans tend to say their browser is quicker and we daresay if we ever find an Internet Explorer user they might claim the same. This is because part of speed is how used you are to the slightly different ways browsers work.

Safari is very good at speeding up jobs for you. As well as the Safari Extensions which bring extra tools to your mouse click or keyboard tap, there are the Reader view settings that make reading quicker. Then, though, there are the now almost silly number of ways Safari can get you to the sites you want and remember them afterwards.

As with any browser, you can hold down the Command key and tap L to move the cursor up to the address bar. It moves the cursor and it also selects everything there so if you want to type a completely new address, you just start typing and the old one is immediately replaced.

If you want to change the existing address, just tap the right or left arrow keys and now the selection is gone and your cursor is at the start or end of the address.

Safari will auto-complete the names of sites you’ve been to before. Once you’re there, you can click on the Bookmarks menu and choose Add Bookmark.

If you’ve opened a lot of tabs then right next to that option there is a command to bookmark all of them. It applies only to the ones in the current window so if you also have multiple windows, you have to go to each one first.

Bookmarks are so 1990s, though. Click in the Safari address bar and delete the address there. Safari then shows you a Favorites screen which by default includes a section with sites you frequently visit.

Pinned tabs

If you really visit them frequently, though, you can pin them. This is the same as loading the page but instead of taking up a whole tab in the menubar, you’re using a favicon-sized one.

To add a site to this collection that’s always displayed at the side of every Safari window, start by going to a site you want. When it’s loaded, you can click on its favicon to the left of the site name in the address bar and drag it over to the other pinned tabs.

Sometimes clicking on that favicon is fiddly, though, so you can instead click and hold on the tab itself. Drag on that and you can slide it over into the pinned tabs and let go.

For sheer speed of access, pinned tabs are excellent. However, they have a problem.

Safari is now very good at preventing sites from blasting you with sound from auto-playing videos. Plus if you have two dozen tabs open and one of them is playing audio, you can now see which one because Safari puts an icon in that tab. It also gives you the option to right-click on that icon and mute the sound without ever going to that tab.

There’s no room for that icon in the pinned tabs. So you can still have sound playing and not know where it’s coming from.

Also, even though you make these pinned tabs by dragging a site’s little favicon, what you get in the tab bar is rarely that favicon. It’s more common to get just a single letter. If you pin AppleInsider then it will become a little button marked “A.” That’s fine until you pin Amazon and now you’ve got two pins with the same letter.

For that reason, it’s best to severely limit the number of tabs you pin because the time saved using them can be lost in hunting for the right one.

There’s another reason to limit them, though. Every tab in every browser takes up some resources from your Mac, even if Safari is good at limiting this. You can end up with a site in a pinned tab that is slowing your Mac down.

So don’t regard pinned tabs as a way of bookmarking, see them instead as where you keep your most urgently and often used sites.

Everything’s adjustable

You could rearrange your pinned tabs to spell out words. Or you could unpin one by right-clicking on choosing from the options that pop up.

That’s Safari at its very heart: you see only a simple interface but you get many more options by right-clicking or choosing Preferences.

The aim is to leave you thinking about the sites you’re visiting and that is laudable. It just also means that you often miss the features that make Safari genuinely superb.

Posted on Leave a comment

Review: Audio-Technica’s ANC700BT headphones sound great, but are marred by odd controls

Audio-Technica’s QuietPoint ATH-ANC700BT tries to bridge the gap between performance and cost, and mostly succeeds except for awkward and unnecessary touch controls.

Audio-Technica QuietPoint ATH-ANC700BT

On the surface there’s nothing remarkable about the 700BT. There’s one color option, matte black, and nothing ostentatious about its design. It looks fine, just nothing to write home about. Bundled accessories are limited to a pouch, a micro USB charging cable, and a 3.5mm headphone jack if you want or need to skip Bluetooth.

As it turns out, you might have to if you’re a Mac or Windows user. Macs may not take kindly to this sort of Bluetooth headset, and out of curiosity, we tried pairing the headphones with a Windows 10 PC — for whatever reason, the computer would only register them as a mic input. Pairing with an iPhone 6s Plus, conversely, was quick and painless. These are obviously mobile-first.

Ergonomically the 700BT manages to be light and extremely comfortable, such that these are some of the few headphones we’ve ever been able to wear all day. They’d be great at the gym too if they were waterproof.

They sound amazing, which is probably to be expected from a company like Audio-Technica and a rated frequency response between 5 and 40,000 hertz. Audio from iTunes, Overcast, or Spotify’s high-quality feed was crisp and clear, with punchy bass lacking any sign of distortion or drowning out highs and mids. You can find better-sounding headphones, but only if you’re willing to spring for something substantially more expensive, at which point there are diminishing returns.

Noise cancellation seems to work well too. When activated in our testing, it effectively killed any sound from our office fan and AC, and even made it difficult to hear other people, much to their frustration. Normally cancellation only drowns out repetitive ambient sound, though of course the 700BT uses an over-the-ear design that further improves isolation.

There’s just one potential dealbreaker for the 700BT, and that’s its on-cup control scheme. Apart from an on/off/pairing switch, everything is controlled either in-app or via a touch-sensitive surface on the left earcup — turning on noise cancellation, for example, requires covering the whole surface with your palm. In our testing this never worked consistently.

Audio-Technica QuietPoint ATH-ANC700BT

We even found it hard to change tracks or volume on occasion, which shouldn’t be the case on any headphones, much less a pair from Audio-Technica. There’s no reason the company couldn’t have implemented dedicated buttons or an inline remote.

Conclusions

If you absolutely depend on headphone-mounted controls, you should skip the 700BT. There are comparable options which will better suit your needs.

If you depend more on Siri or app-based controls, there’s a little more flexibility. Vendors like Amazon are selling them for just $169, and even at full price, they’re $199. That’s a pretty good value if your priorities are comfort and sound quality.

These sound better than the vast majority of Apple/Beats headphones, so if you can pick them up at a discount, they may be worth a go.

Where to buy

Audio-Technica’s QuietPoint ATH-ANC700BT headphones retail for $199, but are currently on sale for $169 at B&H Photo.

B&H is also including free expedited shipping within the contiguous U.S. for fast delivery to your doorstep (typically within one to three business days). The Audio-Technica authorized dealer also will not collect sales tax on orders shipped outside New York and New Jersey*.

Posted on Leave a comment

Hands-On: Ring’s iPhone-ready, self-running Spotlight Cam Solar

 

Hands-On

Amazon’s Ring is omnipresent in smarthome security, and the Spotlight Cam Solar is an attempt to further cement that position among picky iOS and Android users.

Ring Spotlight Cam Solar

As it turns out, the Solar is essentially Ring’s existing Spotlight Cam Battery, but bundled (at a discount) with a solar panel accessory that fixes the original’s main weakness: maintenance.

On its own the Battery needs to have its DSLR-style battery pack periodically recharged. This isn’t just an inconvenience — you may temporarily lose coverage unless you have a spare battery, and in any circumstance you’ll have to mount the camera in a reasonably accessible place, making it more vulnerable to tampering. Because the Solar recharges its battery pack independently, you can put it anywhere your initial installation allows, then forget about it.

Ring Spotlight Cam Solar

The installation process takes about an hour, but is relatively straightforward thanks to video-enhanced guidance provided on Ring’s YouTube channel and in an official iPhone and iPad app. The company supplies all of the necessary tools including bits and screwdrivers, though you might still want to bust out a power drill, especially if you’re working with anything tougher than wood.

The iOS app is, as it turns out, a highlight of the Ring package. It’s extremely well-organized, making it very easy to toggle settings and track alerts and power status. There’s even built-in access to Ring’s Neighbors platform, where individuals and police share footage of suspicious incidents. Some posts tend to be a little paranoid, but it’s at least good to be aware.

One thing we had to do right away was narrow the focus of the Solar’s motion zones. The camera has a wide field of view, and by default triggers push notifications for a good portion of that. Even with a narrower cone, detection seems sensitive — we would get notifications and scan footage only to discover that it had been set off by something like a distant bird.

Ring iPhone app

Saved footage (or the lack thereof) is one of several issues we’ll go into later, but right now we should note that the camera does not support Apple HomeKit. You’ll be relying primarily on first-party notifications, since there isn’t even a Web portal for viewing video.

The camera does of course support Amazon Alexa, meaning that if you have an Echo Show or Echo Spot, you can ask Alexa to show you a live feed at any time. Just be warned that the camera’s namesake spotlight comes on if you watch at night, which could be annoying to neighbors.

Keep following AppleInsider for a full review later this month.

Posted on Leave a comment

Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway increases Apple position by 5 percent

 

Financial mogul Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway loaded up on shares of Apple in the second quarter of 2018, increasing the fund’s position to nearly 252 million shares at the end of the three-month period.

Over the trailing quarter, Berkshire bought 12,388,244 Apple shares worth some $5.4 billion, bringing the fund’s stake in the Cupertino tech giant up to 251,955,877 shares, according to a Securities and Exchange Commission filing released Tuesday. Whether Buffett added to that number since the end of June is unknown.

News of the investment arrives two weeks after the “Oracle of Omaha” revealed buying 75 million Apple shares in the first quarter. Berkshire is Apple’s third-largest shareholder behind investment management firms Vanguard and BlackRock, with a 5 percent stake in the company.

Initially loath to invest in tech stocks due in part to their inherent volatility, Buffett has become a convert, at least when it comes to Apple. Berkshire bought into the company in 2016 with a share purchase worth about $1 billion, a figure that was extended to 57.4 million shares at the end of 2016. That stake increased to 133 million shares a quarter later.

In February, Apple was Berkshire’s largest holding.

“[Apple] was a company I liked, a business I liked, very much,” Buffett said in an interview last week. “It was a company I liked, a business I liked, very much, and we could buy a lot of it I clearly like Apple and why buy ’em to hold, and we bought about 5 percent of the company, and I’d like to own 100 percent of it.”

Apple last month reported its best June quarter ever with revenue of $53.3 billion on 41.3 million iPhone sales. Of note, the company’s crown jewel iPhone line increased its average selling price to $724.12, up from the $605.62 in the year-ago period, thanks to demand for the premium-priced iPhone X.

On the back of its third fiscal quarter beat, Apple became the first publicly traded U.S. company to be valued at $1 trillion.