Posted on Leave a comment

Apple says patent troll should ‘stop digging’ over in appeal to Supreme Court

Apple has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to toss a petition by the Straight Path IP Group claiming the Federal Circuit wrongly upheld a lower court’s ruling in a patent infringement lawsuit without an explanation, with Apple claiming the petition challenges a common court action, and that SPIP should ‘stop digging.’

In 2016, Straight Path IP Group sued Apple in a renewed complaint over allegations the iPhone maker infringed four patents relating to realtime video conferencing and audio conferencing that affects FaceTime, as well as point-to-point communications between devices. The four patents in question survived re-examination by the Patent Trial and Appeals Board after facing challenges to their validity, giving some weight to their validity.

The lawsuit was effectively shut down at the stage of the district court level, with a ruling that the patents were not infringed. SPIP appealed to the Federal Circuit but failed to successfully convince the court, however the appeal’s ruling prompted SPIP to petition the Supreme Court over how the ruling took place.

SPIP questioned one of the Federal Circuit’s Rules of Procedure, specifically whether Rule 36(e) “violates the Fifth Amendment by authorizing panels of the Federal Circuit to affirm, with no explanation whatsover, a District Court judgment resolving only issues of law.” In the appeal in question, the Federal Circuit Panel issued a ruling of “Affirmed” and referenced the ruling in a single-line decision.

SPIP petitioned the Court on August 23, but while Apple and Cisco, the two defending parties involved in the case, waived their right to respond in early September, the Court instead requested both companies file responses by October 18.

In Apple’s response, it introduces the text by advising “The First Law of Holes states: ‘when you find yourself in a hole, stop digging,” and that since SPIP faces possible sanctions for a “frivolous lawsuit,” SPIP is “still digging” by demanding a review of “an oft-denied, splitless question, unrelated to the dubious merits of its case, that would upend the practices of every Circuit and over a century of this Court’s precedents.”

After failing to convince the District Court over the matter, as well as seeing similar results on appeal, Apple notes “Rather than putting away its shovel, Straight Path now asks this Court to grant certiorari – not on the merits of its infringement claim, but on the very practice of issuing summary affirmances under Rule 36.”

The request is “indistinguishable from a dozen other petitions” that the court has previously denied certiorari, Apple argues. “It should meet the same fate.”

SPIP’s query presents “no conflict on a question of federal law,” nor does it “raise any substantial federal question,” as well as being “singularly unimportant” to the judicial system.

“The precise content of a summary affirmance order makes no practical difference to litigants or to the courts,” writes Apple. “And if there were a case to review the question, this is not that case, given that Straight Path’s suit is obviously, and perhaps sanctionably, meritless.”

Posted on Leave a comment

Amazon drops Apple’s 1TB 11-inch iPad Pro to lowest price ever

 

Apple latest iPad Pro with 1TB of space has just received a $250 markdown on Amazon, bringing the price down to $1,099, a record low. Supplies may be limited, so act fast to snap up the deal.

Amazon iPad Pro deal

1TB iPad Pro hits new low price

Amazon’s $250 price drop applies to Apple’s current 11-inch iPad Pro with 1TB storage capacity and Wi-Fi functionality in your choice of Space Gray or Silver. With an MSRP of $1,349, this $1,099.97 price is the lowest ever offered on Amazon, and is at least $50 cheaper than other Apple Authorized Resellers, according to our 11-inch iPad Pro Price Guide.

Other 11-inch iPad Pro storage capacities are also on sale, with prices as low as $674 (a sampling can be found below). And if you plan on taking notes or creating artwork using the 11-inch iPad Pro, the second-generation Apple Pencil 2 is currently $10 off as well.

Best iPad Pro deals

Save on the Apple Pencil 2

2019 AirPods are also on sale

Additional Apple Deals

AppleInsider and Apple authorized resellers are also running a handful of additional exclusive savings this month on Apple hardware that will not only deliver the lowest prices on many of the items, but also throw in discounts on AppleCare and accessories. These deals are as follows:

Interested in additional Apple hardware? See if there is a Mac, iPad or Apple Watch deal that will save you $100s by checking out prices.appleinsider.com.

Posted on Leave a comment

Editorial: Samsung hasn’t copied AppleTV+ yet, but it’s only a matter of time

It’s not true that Samsung copies absolutely everything Apple ever does. Apart from Apple TV+, though, we’re struggling to find another exception —and there are reasons to think TV won’t be safe for long, either.

Even if Samsung didn't ever release a TV service, it's already released TVs

Even if Samsung didn’t ever release a TV service, it’s already released TVs

You can take Apple‘s design chops, and you can take its decades of producing slick videos, but there’s just one reason the company has really been able to make a television service like Apple TV+. “They’re in a billion pockets, y’all.”

Oprah Winfrey has now said that several times, and if the fact that Apple has sold so many devices is also why it has enough money to pay for talent, it’s this ability reach more people that counts.

With cable channels now seeing much the same decline that they wrought on broadcast networks, the ability to deliver television programming to a growing market is irresistible. You just need a loyal audience, with devices that can stream video, and something for them to watch.

So start your stopwatch. Apple’s longtime rival Samsung is surely coming to a screen near you, and soon.

Two companies, both alike

It’s easy to point to how both Apple and Samsung have cash in their pockets. They also, for much the same reason, have a very big audience with a lot of devices out there.

Then if Apple is the first to form an actual television drama production studio, still both companies have years up on years of video experience.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZmBoMZFC8g&w=560&h=315]

It’s hard to forget those Samsung video ads mocking Apple for removing the headphone jack, for instance, although it’s now also a little hard to find them. Samsung removed those ads when it copied the removal of the headphone jack.

Nonetheless, Samsung has people experienced in shooting and delivering video. It only has them doing shortform pieces, but that’s what Apple used to be best at, too.

Irresistible market

Television bases its decisions chiefly on ratings, as in how many people are watching a show. After decades of doing this, you can assume the figures are accurate but no Neilsen estimate algorithm can hold a candle to the precision by which Apple knows how many iPhones it has sold.

Apple may no longer quote iPhone sales figures, and Samsung always optimistically reports numbers of phones made rather than actually sold. But both companies know to the unit how many have been bought.

Television doesn’t work like that. All television channels and networks have to look at what’s called the reach and the share. These plus the demographics of who is watching, and the bottom-line number of how many people tuned in, is how advertising revenue is calculated.

The reach is how many people are watching any television at all. The share is what proportion is tuned to a particular show.

Samsung removes Growing Up from YouTube channels

Both of these figures have gone down radically over the last decades as television viewing has declined and the number of channels available has ballooned.

Whereas the reach of a smartphone has exploded.

If it’s not true that everybody has an iPhone or an Android smartphone, it is true that everybody advertisers want to reach does.

Then if the incredible rise of smartphones is one factor that has persuaded Apple to go into television, the subsequent decline has become another.

Apple is increasingly moving toward providing services rather than solely making devices, and television now seems a great fit.

Right now it’s still the case that having your show watchable on an iPhone is a benefit for your show. It’s ultimately going to be that doing the same thing is really a benefit to iPhone sales.

Cue Samsung

All of these factors are the same for Samsung. It has the same pull of a large audience, and it has the same push of a need to provide services.

It just hasn’t had a model before. For once, Samsung has not had Apple both doing a service and proving it works.

For the moment, it still doesn’t. Apple TV+ could flop, but that looks unlikely. Yet Apple TV+ seemed much more of a risk a few years go.

That’s when Apple started working on it. That’s how long it takes to create a television service that is going to offer over a billion dollars of programming to over a billion devices.

Samsung has yet to find a way to mock Apple TV+ in its adverts, but maybe that’s because this time, it’s already beginning to copy it.

There have been no leaks of deals with producers. No sign, yet, of Samsung buying up a library of existing shows.

There is sign of streaming video becoming a much fiercer battleground than before. When Apple TV+ was first being worked on, there were plenty cable services such as HBO and online-only offerings such as Hulu, but there were really only two contenders.

Now Netflix and Amazon Prime are about to be joined by Disney+, NBC’s Peacock, Apple TV+, and more.

Samsung could be playing a long game and waiting to see which service falters and then just buy it. Yet whether it plans to buy an existing service or create one itself, Samsung is in the same position as Apple. It has the same opportunities and it has the same issues as its rival.

But, it also has something Apple does not. Samsung makes televisions.

Keep up with AppleInsider by downloading the AppleInsider app for iOS, and follow us on YouTube, Twitter @appleinsider and Facebook for live, late-breaking coverage. You can also check out our official Instagram account for exclusive photos.

Posted on Leave a comment

Review: Deebot 661 sweeps and mops your floors so you don’t have to

If you’re looking for a good mid-range robotic vacuum to help keep your home clean, the Deebot 661 might be the perfect fit. This multi-purpose robot can both vacuum and mop your floors, giving you back more time in your day.

Deebot 661

Last year, we took a look at Ecovacs Ozmo 601, a combination vacuum-mopping robot that we liked quite a bit. Today, we’re taking a look at the Ecovacs Deebot 661. It features an upgraded suction system and new cleaning modes to help keep your home looking its best.

The build

The Deebot 661 is a round-front style robotic vacuum, rather than the kind that feature a square front. It’s got a lower profile than many other robotic vacuums, coming in at just a little taller than 3 inches, meaning that it should be able to fit under couches and beds. It weighs around six pounds and feels like it’s fairly sturdy.

On the underside of the robot there are two sweeping arms that are used to feed debris into the beater bar where it is swept into the dustbin. The beater bar is rubber with synthetic bristles and pops out so you can remove hair and debris with the included cleaning tool.

The underside of the robot, showing the dual sweeping brushes and beater bar

The underside of the robot, showing the dual sweeping brushes and beater bar

The dustbin is located on the front of the robot and can be removed by pressing a tab. Emptying the robot is extremely easy and can be done in a couple of seconds. You’ll have to wash the included filter once every couple of weeks and give it 24 hours to fully dry to keep the robot running at peak performance.

The dustbin is also interchangeable and can be swapped with the included water tank, allowing it to double as a robotic mop. There is an included washable microfiber mopping cloth that attaches to the underside of the water tank by velcro.

It includes a remote control which can be used to control the robot if you choose to eschew using the app. The remote works fine, but I tend to lose remotes a lot more than I lose my phone, so I put it in my junk drawer and forgot about it.

Ease of use

Deebot 661 on its charging dock

Deebot 661 on its charging dock

I’m not entirely sure if there’s an easier robot to use than the Deebot 661. Setting it up took just a few seconds and the app holds your hand through the entire process. It’s worth noting that you don’t need to use the iPhone app to use the robot, though.

If you want it to sweep, just make sure you have the dustbin installed. Then, hit the power button, and it will zip around your house, happily ducking under furniture and into hard-to-reach spaces, sucking up whatever it finds. Like all robotic vacuums, make sure you keep cords and clutter off the floor unless you want it to attempt to suck them up. If you want, you can use the app to initiate spot cleaning mode or edge cleaning, which is useful as many robot vacuums tend to miss the edges of rooms.

If you want the robot to mop, fill the water tank with water, swap it with the dustbin, set it on the floor you want mopped, and hit the power button. It automatically detects that it should enter mopping mode and happily mops your floor for you.

When the robot has finished cleaning or the battery is low, it will return to its dock to recharge.

The app and features

Ecovacs App

In the app, you can keep tabs on the health of your robot. Robotic vacuums need to have parts regularly replaced if you expect them to clean well. It’s worth noting that this is also a feature of upright vacuums, though those have a bit of a longer lifespan. Having the ability to quickly view the health of your vacuum’s parts, then purchase the replacements as needed is very useful. I was glad to see it included here.

There’s also the ability to set up a regular cleaning schedule, which I think is the strongest argument for getting a robot vacuum in the first place. I found that this feature worked perfectly, so the Deebot 661 gets points there.

It should be noted that the Deebot 661 does not have a mapping feature like other higher-end robots do. This means that there’s no way to red-zone specific areas to keep the robot out. This could be problematic for areas around desks or tables replete with cords.

Vacuuming

The front view of the robot's dustbin

The front view of the robot’s dustbin

When it comes to vacuuming, the Deebot 661 is pretty good. It doesn’t seem to miss a lot, and I found that it had no trouble sweeping up hair, crumbs, and little bits of paper. Like the Roborock S4, it also pulls an unsettling amount of grit out of the 25 year old carpeting in my apartment. It isn’t as powerful as an upright vacuum, but it is significantly quieter, and if you run it a couple times a week, it keeps your house from getting dirty enough to run that upright vacuum regularly.

The Deebot 661 features two cleaning powers, normal and maximum. The normal mode is sufficient for your average messes. The maximum mode is good if you’ve not cleaned in a while and want to be extra thorough, though I’d imagine it works well for homes with a lot of pet hair as well.

As far as volume goes, it wound up falling somewhere around 58 decibels when I was right next to it. Maximum mode barely made it over 60 decibels. Both modes are unobtrusive enough to allow the vacuum to run while you’re in the room or during the night while you sleep.

For comparison, my upright vacuum —a little green Hoover Air —hits 90 decibels with the beater bar turned on.

Mopping

Deebot 661 mopping

I’ll be the first to admit, I’m skeptical when it comes to the idea of a robot mopping for you. To mop a floor to an adequately clean state, pick at least two: friction, cleaner, and heat. The Deebot 661 doesn’t, though.

When you mop the old fashioned way, your best tool is elbow grease, or more accurately, friction. Humans do this by exerting downward force on a mop, brush, cloth, etc. Robots don’t really have this capability. Ideally, a robot would be heavy enough to push down and loosen anything that is stuck to the floor, but the Deebot 661 is lightweight, even when fully filled with water.

Heat also helps by softening sticky and persistent dirt and allowing it to be swept away. However, there’s no heating element in the Deebot 661, and due to the plastic water reservoir, I’d be hesitant to fill it up with boiling water in the first place.

Chemical cleaners also help quite a bit. Surfactants prevent hydrogen bonding and the low surface tension cleaning solution unsticks dirt and grime from the floor. That’s all well and good, but the Deebot 661 can’t actually use chemical cleaners. The instruction book warns to avoid using cleaners as they will jam the reservoir.

As far as I can tell, most vacuum-and-mopping robots work this way. Some of iRobot’s Braava line seems to be able to use specialized cleaners, but only on the higher-end models that feature a Swiffer-style spray function. This means that this isn’t a problem of the Deebot 661, but of robotic mopping in general.

The robot's water tank and included microfiber cleaning pad

The robot’s water tank and included microfiber cleaning pad

That doesn’t mean that the mopping function is worthless, it just means you’re going to need to be a little clever. The Deebot 661 doesn’t suck any water back up into its cleaning reservoir, so you can soak the included cleaning pad in cleaning solution if you need to. I also found that spraying difficult stains with a cleaner of my choice —a solution of hot water, white vinegar, and rubbing alcohol —and letting it sit for a few minutes before running the Deebot 661 did wonders.

On top of that, because it’s a quick process to fill the robot and press the power button, you can run it more often. One of the biggest issues that the Deebot 661 solves is consistency. If you mop your kitchen or bathroom a couple times a week with the Deebot 661, chances are you’re not going to have any buildup of dirt and grime that is going to need a lot of effort to clean up. It’s a win-win.

In short, if you start with a clean kitchen, the Deebot 661 will help you keep it clean. As an added bonus, it doesn’t leave that nasty build-up that happens if you use an easy-mop like Swiffer.

There is, however, one major problem. The Deebot 661 doesn’t seem to have hard floor/carpets detection or the Braava’s “never go behind the line where it started” feature. This means that if you have carpet, the Deebot 661 will try to mop it. I solved this problem by setting a box in front of my kitchen doorway, which prevented the robot from crossing onto the carpet. However, I have a galley-style kitchen in a studio apartment, so anyone with a more open-concept layout may need to hold back from this purchase or come up with a more clever solution than mine.

Overall

The Deebot 661 is a solid purchase if you’re looking for a good mid-range robot vacuum. The ability to set it up on a regular schedule can help keep your house clean with minimal effort on your behalf. If you’d like to pick up a Deebot 661 for yourself, they retail at Amazon for $319.99.

Pros

  • Schedule feature keeps your house clean with minimal effort
  • Decent price for features offered
  • Low profile makes cleaning under furniture easy

Cons

  • Mopping yields middling results
  • Robot will attempt to mop carpeted surfaces

Score: 3.5 stars out of 5

Posted on Leave a comment

Extend your Mac display to another Mac with Luna Display 4.0

 

You can now extend or mirror your main Mac’s screen onto a second Mac as easily as you can with Sidecar and an iPad with Luna Display 4.0.

Extending a single desktop across an iMac and a MacBook Pro. (Photo: Luna Display.)

Extending a single desktop across an iMac and a MacBook Pro. (Photo: Luna Display.)

Before Apple introduced Sidecar in macOS Catalina, firms including Luna Display provided the same ability to use an iPad as a second display. Now the latest version of Luna Display 4.0 lets you do the same thing, but with either an iPad or a spare Mac.

The company calls it Mac-to-Mac-Mode and says that the aim is to make the most out of multiple Apple devices at once.

“Apple has always marketed its products to be standalone, never intended to be used at the same time.” says the firm in a statement. “While you can connect devices through AirDrop, or pick up where you left off in Safari and the Messages app, the idea remains the same: it is all about picking up one product, and setting the other down.”

“Where we differ from Apple is that, instead of limiting ourselves to using each product individually, we see the potential that comes from a combination of products that is greater than the sum of its parts,” it continues.

Apple’s Sidecar requires macOS Catalina to work with an iPad, but is also limited to certain newer Macs. Luna Display 4.0 brings the feature to older models, with the main Mac needing 2015’s macOS El Capitan or later.

The secondary Mac, the one used as an extra display, can be running an even older OS, going back to 2012’s macOS Mountain Lion.

[embedded content]

Luna Display is a combination of a hardware and software product. The hardware aspect is a dongle that you plug into the main Mac, and comes in versions for either USB-C or Mini DisplayPort.

The software element is an app that must be run on both machines. Luna Display works only wirelessly, and the two devices must be on the same Wi-Fi network.

Luna Display costs $69 direct from the developer, and there is a launch discount of 25%.

Posted on Leave a comment

Apple website, Apple Music, developer services suffering from outage

 

A number of Apple’s online services have suddenly gone offline, with websites and online tools no longer accessible and services like Apple Music encountering errors when trying to stream songs.

At around 1:24pm eastern, AppleInsider noticed the official Apple newsroom was inaccessible, displaying a message advising the page “cannot be found.” Shortly after, other areas of Apple’s online existence stopped working or were unavailable.

In further checks by AppleInsider staff, Apple’s developer site also became unavailable, and the official System Status page that usually displays issues with servers is also offline. Other services are also undergoing issues, including some outages of iCloud itself.

Apple Music was also affected by the outage, with attempts to play music not downloaded to a device displaying errors. One error advised that “A server with the specified hostname could not be found.”

In the time since the discovery of issues, some services are slowly being restored, with the newsroom and iCloud back up and running, followed by the System Status page and Apple Music.

AppleInsider has contacted Apple to query about the server issues.

This story is breaking, refresh for the latest updates

Posted on Leave a comment

Hollywood producers talk about Apple’s TV+ plans & ‘The Morning Show’ problems

Sources in Hollywood say that ‘The Morning Show’ was always going to be Apple TV+’s centerpiece but reveal its troubled history —and comment on Apple’s limited library, its television inexperience, plus its interference with shows.

“The Morning Show” (Photo: Apple)

When Apple TV+ launches on November 1, it will do so with only a handful of shows, but the now much-publicized “The Morning Show” will be at the center of its offerings. In the two years since Apple began work on this drama series, though, it has had problems.

According to The Hollywood Reporter, the “The Morning Show” production company and producer/stars Jennifer Aniston and Reese Witherspoon did not rate the first-draft script by showrunner Jay Carson.

It didn’t help that the #MeToo plot element that now appears key to the series didn’t feature at all, and that it was written at the time this movement appeared. Carson was soon replaced by the more experienced writer/showrunner Kerry Ehrin —and then Apple got a taste of how different television is to technology.

Carson filed with the Writers’ Guild of America to be credited as sole creator of “The Morning Show,” a title which typically infers considerable financial benefits if the show is a success. Apple, Aniston, Witherspoon and their production company reportedly objected, but the WGA ruled in favor of Carson.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eA7D4_qU9jo&w=560&h=315]

“The Morning Show” was not the only series to change its showrunner. Steven Spielberg’s “Amazing Stories” had such a change and, according to The Hollywood Reporter, a similar move is soon to happen with “See.”

Such changes and pressures are far from new to television production, but they may be new to Apple. For once, the company is relying much more on outside experience and facing new challenges.

“They didn’t step in halfway,” CAA TV agent Sonya Rosenfeld told The Hollywood Reporter. “They were smart to hire people who have spent their careers at the center of the TV business, and they didn’t stutter start.”

Apple also didn’t skimp on budgets, either. “The Morning Show” reportedly costs $15 million per episode and Apple has a two-season deal which amounts to a total of $300 million. Similarly, “See” is believed to be costing Apple $240 million for two seasons.

The Hollywood Reporter also says that Apple is spending on the cast and crew talent, by giving every series regular and showrunner their choice of free Apple product.

Reportedly, Apple sends representatives to the sets of these shows to take orders. Unfortunately, says The Hollywood Reporter, Apple is also said to be sending representatives to sets in order to give orders.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Rg0y7NT1gU&w=560&h=315]

Apple’s interference is said to be why the original “Amazing Stories” showrunners left.

However, the company has seemingly not balked at adult language being used in “The Morning Show,” so long as it is seen as essential to the storyline.

The Hollywood Reporter also says that Apple had a previous problem with adult-oriented fare, though, before this slate of Apple TV+ programming was created. Allegedly, Apple produced an entire series called “Vital Signs,” created by Dr Dre, which has been abandoned over sex and violence issues.

Apple has not commented on the existence of “Vital Signs,” nor did it contribute to The Hollywood Reporter‘s article.

Sources who did contribute on condition of anonymity, said that Apple’s March launch event had been a disappointment. While it had a very strong lineup of cast and crew, it was light on details and footage —and especially so when compared to Disney+. In April, Disney+ was announced with its large library and specifics about its cost.

“Everyone was feeling like Apple threw the best prom ever,” said an unnamed producer with an Apple show. “Then Disney came out, and everyone realized, ‘Maybe it didn’t.'”

Apple TV+ launches on November 1, and will cost $4.99 per month.

Posted on Leave a comment

Interfaces more important to video streaming service users than content

 

A consumer research report claims that users of video services like Netflix are more likely to recommend it to others because of the user interface and overall ease of use, more than what programmes are available.

Tim Cook promotes Dickinson, one of the shows Apple TV+ is launching with in November

Tim Cook promotes Dickinson, one of the shows Apple TV+ is launching with in November

Research firm Parks Associates claims that the content of a streaming video service is less important than the user interface design and how easy it is to find something to watch. The report comes ahead of the launch of Apple TV+, which has the advantage of Apple‘s design and the disadvantage of a much smaller library of material than its rivals.

Parks Associates researcher Brandon Riney also told AppleInsider that despite its lack of content compared to Netflix and the forthcoming Disney+, Apple brings a distinct advantage to the market.

“Apple’s unexpected $4.99 pricing appears to be a response to Disney+’s $6.99 per month,” he said. “This, in combination with announcing a fuller slate of originals, addresses criticism from detractors that Apple TV+ did not have adequate content and value to compete.”

“Offering a complimentary year of service to buyers of an Apple product as a loss leader is a strategy consistent with Apple’s background as a device maker,” he continued. “This move provides a value-added feature for all of its hardware that other services cannot easily replicate.”

However, according to the report, 70% of US households who have a video subscription already rate their user interfaces as “good,” and 48% as “very good.”

Roku and Apple TV lead the streaming media player space in terms of ease-of-use,” says Parks Associates’ senior analyst Kristen Hanich, “while Fire TV is the undisputed leader in terms of voice control.”

Users in the report’s survey who said they had both a streaming video player and a smart TV, were asked which they preferred in regard to ease of use.

Of the households with an existing Apple TV, 38% said they preferred it to their smart TV, compared to 20% who expressed a preference for the other way around.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eA7D4_qU9jo&w=560&h=315]

In comparison, 27% of Google Chromecast users preferred it to their TV, while 38% ranked their smart TV higher.

“Apple TV owners give relatively strong marks to the device’s UI,” says the report. “Chromecast owners rate [their] device relatively low in terms of ease of use and ease of finding something to watch. Tellingly, ease of use is relatively less important to those who purchased a Chromecast.”

Despite an overall preference for ease of use and searching, the report also says that users are now more focused on shows rather than having channel loyalty.

“Consumers are interested in finding particular shows or genres of content and have less interest in browsing by channel,” said Hanich.

Apple TV+ launches on November 1, and is followed on November 12 by Disney+.

Posted on Leave a comment

Review: iFrogz Airtime Pro wireless earbuds are a solid alternative if you can’t wear AirPods

New Airtime Pro wireless earbuds from iFrogz offers a lower cost alternative to Apple’s AirPods, and one that may fit some people’s ears better.

Airtime Pro wireless earbuds

Utah-based iFrogz has come out with the Airtime Pro wireless earbuds, an upgraded version of their former Airtime earbuds. They’ve made some impressive changes which have lead to an overall increase in quality, but are they a good alternative to something like Apple’s AirPods?

Appearance & features

The Airtime Pro earbuds are a stem-style earbuds, much like Apple’s own AirPods. A big benefit of stem-style earbuds are the lack of the behind-the-neck cord, which I find often gets snagged on coat collars or bag straps.

The Airtime Pro earbuds come in three colors: black, white, and navy blue. I received a white pair, which have a matte, pearlescent quality to them that I really enjoy.

The Airtime Pro earbuds are IPX4 sweat resistant, too, which means they’re gym friendly.

Comfort

The biggest benefit of the Airtime Pro earbuds is that for those who can’t use AirPods due to their size and shape —like me, for example —they fit a lot more like a traditional in-ear earbud. The Airtime Pro earbuds come with three sizes of earbud tips, giving you the chance to find a size that has a decent chance of working for you. Some users do state, however, that the sizes run a little small.

Earbuds on case

I also was impressed at the overall comfort these had. They’re not heavy in the slightest, which meant that I didn’t get the same ear fatigue I’d get from wearing other wireless headphones that feature a behind-the-neck cord.

Ease of use

These earbuds are extremely easy to use, which makes them a great choice for just about anyone. As soon as you open the case and take one out, it enters pairing mode. If you’ve never paired it with a device before, the setup is quick and easy. If you have paired it with a device before, it connects quickly and with no problem.

Controlling the Airtime Pro earbuds is easy, too. Looking to turn up the volume? Just tap and hold the right earbud. A tap and hold to the left reduces it. A quick tap on either earbud will pause your audio, while two quick taps on the right or left earbud will skip forward or backward through your playlist respectively. Three taps on either earbud will call up Siri for voice commands.

Charging the earbuds is simple, too. Just pop them back into the charging case and you’re good to go. The charging case recharges via USB-C and can recharge your Airtime Pro earbuds anywhere between four or five times.

Closeup of earbud

There is a caveat, though. While I found pairing and charging the earbuds to be a breeze, attempting to reset them was less so. Performing a factory reset requires following a multi-step, extremely precise process. It was so complex that I genuinely fear the day that I may need to factory reset them. If you lose the instruction booklet that comes with your iFrogz, there’s probably no chance of you being able to accurately remember the ten steps required to reset them.

Sound & performance

Are these the highest end headphones I’ve ever used? No. However, I’m not typically blown away by an earbud, let alone a wireless one. The Airtime Pro earbuds had a completely acceptable sound quality. The highs aren’t tinny, the lows aren’t “mushy,” there’s a decent volume range. I will say that I prefer audio somewhat quieter than most people I know. The Airtime Pro earbuds might not offer enough volume for people who like their music truly ear-splittngly loud.

I never had any issues with them disconnecting from either my iPhone 11 or my Mac mini. They feature Bluetooth 5.0, so they’ve got an impressive amount of range to them, though I never got far enough from my device for it to drop out. I also never had an issue with the left or right earbud unpairing from each other.

As far as phone call capabilities went, I was extremely satisfied with these earbuds. I managed to carry on an hour and a half conversation while I prepared dinner and cleaned the kitchen and never once had an issue with sound quality. I could hear the person on the other end just fine, and they had no trouble hearing me. The microphone isn’t especially noise isolating, but they said that it didn’t sound any worse than if I were talking on the phone.

I was able to get about four hours of playtime out of the Airtime Pro earbuds before I had to pop it back into the charging case. The earbuds charge very quickly as well, which is a boon if you’re caught in a noisy environment. Just ten minutes in the case got me plenty of playtime to make it through the rest of my lengthy and somewhat noisy commute.

Overall

I think that for most people, the Airtime Pro earbuds is a solid alternative to something like Apple’s AirPods, either because you may not be able to wear AirPods, or because you’re not ready to spend AirPods amounts of money on headphones.

They’re comfortable, they sound pretty good, and they fit comfortably in my ears, which means most people with smaller ear canals can probably make use of them. If you want to snag your own Airtime Pro earbuds, you can head over to Zagg, where you can grab them for $69.99.

Pros

  • Easy to use
  • Comfortable to wear, especially if AirPods are off the table
  • Decent sound

Cons

  • Lower maximum volume compared to other earbuds on the market
  • Overly complicated factory reset process

Score: 4 out of 5

Posted on Leave a comment

Review: BRV-Mini speakers pack big sound in a portable package

If you’re looking for a portable speaker that can keep up with you on all your adventures, take a look at Braven’s BRV-Mini. Their small size hides big sound in a tough, but diminutive package.

BRV-Mini and iPad

Braven’s new pint-sized portable Bluetooth speakers, the BRV-Mini, are ultra-rugged, ultra-portable speakers designed to go just about anywhere. We took a look at these rugged little speakers to see if they held up to our expectations.

Appearance and features

The BRV-Mini is a small, squat speaker that I would place in the ultra-portable category. A single speaker is roughly the circumference of a can of soda, meaning it drops pretty easily into a bag if you want to take it on the go. The included lanyard allows you to hang it from a carabiner if you want to take it with you on a trek through the great outdoors.

As an added bonus, two BRV-Minis can be paired together, giving you a stereo experience or to help fill a larger room with more sound. I found that these work wonderfully as portable desk speakers, giving me the ability to pair two with my iPad to play podcasts as I work.

The BRV-Mini is waterproof IPX7 rated and even floats, meaning that it’s safe to take poolside or along for a canoe trip. Its rugged design also makes it the perfect stocking stuffer for teens and tweens who might still be a bit hard on their tech gear.

The BRV-Mini speakers are available in a few different colors, including black, gray, red, and navy blue. I have a pair of the navy blue and think they look pretty great. These speakers boast an outdoorsy, rugged look, so they might not be the best gift for someone who prizes a sleek, minimalist aesthetic.

Sound and performance

I’ve used enough Braven products at this point to know that they generally produce some quality speakers. The BRV-Mini is no exception. Despite its small size, the BRV-Mini packs some serious punch. The speakers have a substantial amount of bass and clear, defined mid- and high-range. The maximum volume is extremely impressive for a speaker this small, and there’s not a lot of sound degradation at higher levels. Overall, this is what I would consider a solid-sounding speaker. Pair two BRV-Minis together and it’s even better.

As for hands-free speaker calling, I wasn’t impressed. I haven’t found many Bluetooth speakers that can double as a viable hands-free option, and this one didn’t blow me out of the water. It does, however, work well enough to control Siri on my Mac mini if I need that functionality.

The battery life is also worth talking about. At a low to medium volume, you can easily get upwards of 10 to 12 hours out of a single speaker, though pairing two together does reduce this a bit, as does playing audio at higher levels of volume. The speakers can be charged via USB-C and charge fairly quickly. I, for one, incredibly thankful that Braven has ditched the significantly more annoying micro-USB in favor of the far superior USB-C.

It’s also worth noting that the BRV-Mini features Bluetooth 5.0, which means it has an impressive amount of range. Provided there’s not too much physical interference, it’s possible to pair two speakers together and put them in different areas of your house for uninterrupted listening.

Ease of use

Like most of Braven’s products, these speakers are pretty easy to use. I was able to pair one with my computer, iPhone, and iPad without needing to turn to the instruction booklet. Braven has clearly marked the BRV-Mini’s play button with the Bluetooth symbol—just press and hold to enter pairing mode.

Pairing two together did require me to read the booklet, but fortunately, it’s a two-step process that takes mere seconds to complete. It’s definitely one of the more painless pairing processes I’ve had to endure.

Overall

Again, I’ve had enough experience with Braven to not be surprised that these are great little speakers. While they’re not going to replace a thousand dollar home audio system, I think that they have their place. As I said earlier, these are great speakers for kids who might still be a bit rough on gear, as well as outdoor enthusiasts. If you’re looking to grab one —or two —you can get them from Zagg for $39.99 each.

Pros

  • Easy to pair, both to devices and to each other
  • Great sound quality
  • Surprisingly loud maximum volume
  • Durable enough to stand up to most abuse

Cons

  • Not great for hands-free phone calls

Score: 5 out of 5