Posted on Leave a comment

The Touch Bar on the MacBook Pro is well implemented, but serves no useful purpose

With the 2016 MacBook Pro came polarization of the user base. It wasn’t just over USB-C, but also Apple’s new Touch Bar as well.

[embedded content]

The TouchBar’s debut

The Touch Bar was intended to appear and function as a dynamic OLED strip of virtual keyboard keys, unconfined by the physical structure of mechanical keys. Optimally, all the keys are context-sensitive, changing not just appearance but size based on what app the user is in, and what the user is doing.

The old key functions aren’t quite gone. If you hold down the FN key, the Touch Bar reverts to a standard strip of 12 function keys and the ESC key. If you boot into Windows, the Touch Bar reverts to displaying virtual FN keys.

After nearly 21 months of use, the verdict is still out on the Touch Bar here at AppleInsider. It’s not a universal tool, and we don’t use it for everything. Mileage may vary, user to user.

We said once that the the Touch Bar will take some time to mature and find its best uses. Out of the box, it hasn’t really fulfilled its promise, but still has potential.

More on that potential in a bit.

Lacking as a video or audio editing tool

We do a lot of video work, as you can probably tell. The idea of a digital, customizable control panel that gives quick access to shortcuts was, and is, intriguing.

Anything that can speed up workflow is a welcome addition. We gave Apple the benefit of the doubt and tried our best to incorporate the Touch Bar —but it just didn’t’ stick.

Touch Bar use is literally limited to display brightness and volume adjustments. In Final Cut Pro, you have buttons to use as shortcut but none of them are new or innovative and each one of them can be accessed faster by using the keyboard. We did learn a few more shortcuts that we didn’t know about previously, but we just looked up the keyboard commands for them.

The best video editing feature of the Touch Bar is seeing the video timeline and being able to scroll. But, for maximum efficiency and speed, you’re better off sticking with the keyboard plus mouse or trackpad.

In general use

We don’t have any complaints about the hardware at all. It is quick, and updates rapidly. The images are crisp and clear, and the touch sensitivity is second to none. It’s just not that good in actual use.

The Touch Bar has its uses for non-editors, but they are few and far between. Safari has a few niceties in Safari with open tabs, but given that you’re looking at the screen to surf, this isn’t the most convenient thing.

As we said talking about the 2017 MacBook Pro as a whole a year later, our Touch Bar use is generally limited to display brightness and volume adjustments. With some options, Touch Bar forces users navigate an extra menu to find certain settings, like adjusting the keyboard backlight and skipping audio tracks, tasks that take one simple keypress on standard function keys.

Some of these are Apple’s user interface choices. Apple itself doesn’t give users that much in the way of configuration options in this regard, but there is a way forward.

Third parties to the rescue!

Regarding potential, a third party app called Better Touch Tool allows users to completely customize the Touch Bar. In short, the bar can become a custom keyboard extension, with just about every parameter configurable for any given app.

At a touch, Better Touch Tool can also run Apple Scripts, and return a value to the Touch Bar. So, there are already info-dense tools available for it, including weather and stock tools.

So, all those things that Apple didn’t include for customization, Better Touch Tool can do.

There’s a lot more that it can do, even for trackpad users. It’s free to try out for 45 days, or it’s included in a Setapp subscription.

There is another one we like called called 2Touch which isn’t quite as robust, but leverages Apple’s accessibility options to give the user a few more choices for the bar.

Probably not going away

We can’t imagine a scenario where Apple decides to pull the Touch Bar. In all likelihood it will continue to offer a lower-end MacBook Pro with function keys, but won’t make it optional across the line.

The Touch Bar could be great. It’s got the ability to be great, as we’ve demonstrated. And, as we’ve said before, it has more to do with making the Mac easier for iOS users, than helping existing Mac users.

We can’t help but feel that the Touch Bar is a transition to something else. While we’d prefer that tactile keys don’t go away, between the short travel on Apple’s Butterfly keyboard and the Touch Bar, we’re starting to wonder if Apple wants to build a machine without a physical keyboard, and one with all virtual keys.

We’ll see in the fullness of time, of course. But, like many other courses Apple has set, there’s likely a destination on the horizon —we just can’t see what it is yet.

Posted on Leave a comment

7 hours in the spaceship: interviewing for a job at Apple Park

A personal account of a job interview held at Apple Park appears to paint a picture of the new headquarters’ inner workings, from staff docents to iPad-powered coffee dispensers, in intriguing detail.

Briefly published to Reddit before being deleted from view, the recent post from a throwaway account talks about a prospective hire being interviewed for a position on the Mac team. While the author does not discuss what happened during the interview itself, they do cover the experience of visiting the campus for the entire day.

On arrival at the Tantau Avenue reception center, the writer was checked in and provided with a green visitor’s lanyard, which also identified their host for the day. They were then instructed to follow a path to the main building, one that is obstructed by hills and the path itself before offering a “spectacular view of the side.”

Two sets of employees welcomed the individual, with blue-shirted Apple Security personnel accompanied by green-shirted “greeters,” who acted as guides in a similar way to front-of-store Apple retail employees directing customers to other store staff. Informed the building was quite confusing, “especially for guests,” the poster notes they received assistance from a number of the green-clad employees to the appropriate area.

Checked in by another greeter at Apple Park Section 1 and asked to wait in the lobby, the writer remarks the area “looked custom made and very new,” complete with comfy couches and beanbag chairs. Guests also had access to a pastry bar and coffee at the location.

The coffee stations are noted as having a “Moen faucet” style spigot that contains four smaller hoses, used to dispense hot, chilled, and ambient temperature water along with freshly brewed coffee. The station was controlled by an iPad, which offered to dispense coffee in a user-specified quantity, selected by a slider. Nearby was a “small but well-staffed cafe” that provided espresso drinks and pastries.

According to the writer, each of the nine sections has its own coffee station and cafe, separate from the main dining area.

The interview room is described as being made from wood, but one with small 1 to 2 millimeter holes across the surface used for ventilation. As the world’s largest naturally ventilated building, the writer noted they did not see any air vent grates, while the ceiling of the room was made from granite.

The room also had a circular table, chairs, a glass whiteboard, and a soft LED light strip that ran along the middle of the wall along the sides. The glass walls facing the hallway had motorized blinds for privacy, rather than the author’s expected use of frosted glass.

Two hours into the interview process, the writer was walked to another section of the ring for lunch, ordering from the app-based Caffe Macs menu. The low-cost food is reportedly similar in quality to that offered at Caffe Macs at Infinite Loop, but the experience of eating has apparently benefited from Apple “building the place to accommodate thousands upon thousands of people per day.”

The main dining area is described as sizable, both in terms of floor space and with a ceiling taking advantage of the size of the building, complete with ample natural light and trees within the dining space. Sitting on a third-floor balcony to eat, the author was able to look out onto the campus’ inner ring, calling it “honestly breathtaking.”

Following lunch, interviews continued for another four hours. Potential employees are warned that a 6 to 7-hour interview process is “the norm,” so to expect spending an entire day going through the process.

While the original post about the visit was posted on Thursday, the entire post was removed and the associated account deleted hours later. It is possible that the author removed it due to the risk associated with publishing details about Apple’s headquarters affecting their chances of getting the job they interviewed for, a probable conclusion considering the comments below the now-wiped post.

Numerous commenters advised to take down the post, suggesting it would be against any signed non-disclosure agreements, and that it was highly probable someone at Apple would have read the post and identified the author.

Despite the anonymous nature of the post, numerous elements of the article match up with the experience of one AppleInsider contributor’s own visit to the campus. Descriptions of the food, coffee stations, and the iPad-based menus correlate with what was seen on that occasion, as well as the heightened security and the attention to detail in building and decorating the working environment.

Posted on Leave a comment

iOS 12’s Siri Shortcuts app goes live for developers only

 

Developers can now request access to an early version of Apple’s Shortcuts app, which lets iOS 12 owners create custom automations triggered through Siri.

iOS 12 Shortcuts

Access is restricted to developers only, and people accepted for testing must install the app through TestFlight. In release notes, Apple cautions that “limited actions” are currently available, and won’t sync via iCloud.

In fact the Shortcuts beta has several known issues, others being that some actions won’t appear when running custom shortcuts in Siri, and it can’t yet open apps when a device is locked. Apple also notes that shortcuts provided to the INVoiceShortcutCenter suggested shortcuts API are not available when viewing an app’s actions in Shortcuts.

Apple issued a second public beta of iOS 12 earlier on Thursday.

The promise of Shortcuts is the expansion of automation beyond HomeKit to every aspect of iOS, so long as developers enable hooks in their own titles. During Apple’s WWDC keynote in June, the company used the example of a custom “I’m heading home” phrase for Siri, which automatically texted a contact with a preset message, adjusted a HomeKit thermostat, turned on a fan, presented estimated travel time, and started playing NPR. In iOS 11, this would require several separate commands.

The concept is similar to the skills and routines baked into Amazon’s Alexa. To develop its own equivalent Apple bought out Workflow, which allows automations akin to Shortcuts but more limited.

Posted on Leave a comment

Review: LIFX Beam with Apple HomeKit is a cool remote-controlled lighting feature

The Beam may be a luxury, and has a few rough edges, but proves to be a cool way of making smart lighting a focus of your home instead of just another fixture.

Within the niche world of LED smart lighting, there seems to be a burgeoning demand for lights as decorations. Companies like Philips and LIFX have lightstrips, LIFX specifically has the Tile, and Nanoleaf has its Light Panels. After all, why stick to bulbs when you’re not bound by the limitations of incandescents or fluorescents?

The LIFX Beam seems like an obvious addition in some respects, but oddly enough, the concept doesn’t seem to have been done before. Think of it has a rigid lightstrip, only one that’s meant to be conspicuously placed rather than line a desk or entertainment center. You can still do that, naturally.

Despite the singular in its name, the Beam kit actually includes six beams, as well as a corner piece, power adapter, and controller unit. The beams and corner join together magnetically, and can be arranged in different patterns — typically in L-shapes or a straight line, since LIFX only includes one corner.

Installation may be the trickiest part of the whole endeavor. Beam ends can only join opposite magnetic poles, and each segment sticks to the wall with special 3M adhesive, meaning you’ll have to press against them to make sure they stick firm and flat. You can pull them off and reapply, if need be — and you probably will at one point, whether to pick another pattern, level the lights, or make sure that the power adapter (which is also magnetic) can connect to the beam closest to your wall socket.

It’s also vital to make sure the connectors on each beam are in full contact. As we discovered, if one of them is even slightly loose, it can prevent others from lighting up. In the case of HomeKit, it can cause a “no response” error in the iOS Home app. This probably could’ve been solved if LIFX had used a snap-together design instead of magnets.

Assuming all goes well though, the LIFX app does a good job of onboarding, guiding users through adding the Beam to the LIFX cloud as well as HomeKit. If you want to go a step further you can add it to Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, and even Microsoft Cortana, as well as platforms like IFTTT and Nest.

We were able to test the product with HomeKit/Siri and Alexa. Both share largely the same set of voice commands, allowing you to change color and brightness, and turn the light on and off. The accessory can also be integrated into scenes and automations, for example automatically turning on at night.

You truly can’t get the most out of it though without its proprietary app. Siri, Alexa, and the iOS Home app can only set one uniform color, whereas the LIFX app can take advantage of the 10 separate lighting zones on each beam. With six beams and an illuminated corner, you could theoretically have up to 61 different colors on your wall.

The app includes 18 preset themes, which can be applied to the Beam specifically or to a group of LIFX lights. You can further choose whether to make color transitions solid or blended. If none of these fit your mood, you can choose to “paint” your own theme. This generally works well, but you can’t save your creations, and since the app can’t tell what shape you’ve made with the Beam it’s hard to gauge where colors will appear.

Neat but of mixed quality are 9 separate “effects,” which (usually) override any theme you have enabled. We found “Color Cycle,” “Animate Theme,” and “Move” visually appealing — the rest are disposable, such as “Music Visualizer,” which depends on your device’s microphone and didn’t match the songs we were playing all that well.

All that being said, how well does the Beam actually light a room? Reasonably. It’s surprisingly bright at full intensity, but unless you’re right next to it or in a small office, you’ll probably want an extra lamp or two if you intend to read anything.

Conclusions

By now, you’ve probably already decided on whether you want a Beam based purely on photos. Rest assured that yes, in person, the product does make a room look like something out of “Blade Runner” or other ’80s cyberpunk fantasies. It’s ideal for movie and gaming spaces for that reason.

If you’re going to get one, just be aware that it’s not meant to be a practical product. It can only ever illuminate a small space, making it a decoration first and foremost. If you enjoy its looks and have the budget needed to get one, otherwise, none of its quirks should be enough to stop you.

Score: 4 out of 5

Where to buy

The LIFX Beam retails for $199.99 and is available at Amazon.com with free shipping.

Posted on Leave a comment

Comparing the six major live TV streaming services for cord cutters

For all the appeal of services like Netflix and HBO Now, some people just can’t bear to part with live TV when they cut the cord. Here are the major options DirecTV Now, Playstation Vue, Sling TV, Hulu with Live TV, YouTube TV, and WatchTV compared, and how to decide which to get — if any.

Fiber optic cables

Sling TV

Sling TV

One of the first internet-only live TV services and still often considered the go-to, Dish Network’s Sling is divided primarily into “Orange” and “Blue” bundles, each costing $25 per month. The first includes 30 channels, while the second includes 42. The biggest difference is that while Blue includes Fox, NBC, and the pair’s sports networks, Orange has ESPN 1, 2, and 3. $40 merges both packages with plenty of overlap.

Instead of selling additional tiers, Sling relies on small add-ons. Most, such as Epix, “Sports Extra,” and “Best of Spanish TV,” are $5 per month. There’s a strong emphasis on international content — indeed for some people Sling may be the only way to go, since it has add-ons for countries you may not find anywhere else, like China and India.

“Premium” channels like HBO, Showtime, and Starz are also available, but usually at a higher cost. HBO for example is $15, as much as a separate HBO Now subscription, although here you get the live feed on top of on-demand content. Basketball freaks can sign up for NBA “Team Passes” that cover specific teams for $18, or the entire league for $29.

Cloud DVR support is another $5 add-on. This includes up to 50 hours of material, so you can’t go berserk picking shows and movies.

Supported Apple devices include iPhones, iPads, and the Apple TV.

PlayStation Vue

PlayStation Vue

In case there was any confusion, PlayStation Vue has long been available on more than just Sony’s PlayStation consoles. As with Sling, it’s on iPhones, iPads, and the Apple TV.

The platform is divided into four tiers: Access, Core, Elite, and Ultra. Access, priced at $45 per month, includes about 47 channels such as AMC, Cartoon Network, SyFy, and ESPN 1 and 2. Notably this includes sports networks from NBC and Fox.

Sony has a pretty hefty amount of sports content included in its default plans, and even some non-sports channels you might have a hard time finding. To sum up though, Core costs $50 for over 60 channels, Elite is $60 for 87, and Ultra is $80 for over 90. Notably, Ultra incorporates HBO and Showtime.

There are far fewer add-on options for Vue than Sling, but some include channels that are missing even from the Ultra package, such as Cinemax or some of the more niche sports channels.

Some perks of the service include up to 10 profiles, the ability to stream on as many as five devices simultaneously, and hold as much DVR content as you want for up to 28 days and 500 programs.

YouTube TV

YouTube TV

This one has just a single $40 plan, but with over 60 channels, some highlights being several ESPN options, and the four major broadcast networks: ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox, along with a bunch of their affiliated channels. Naturally Google also tosses in YouTube Red Originals.

Showtime, Starz, Shudder, Fox Soccer Plus, and Sundance Now are the only add-ons available, so people wanting the likes of HBO will have to turn elsewhere. It also lacks important channels like Comedy Central, so keep that in mind.

As features go there isn’t much to distinguish YouTube — a subscription includes six accounts, and the ability to stream to three devices simultaneously. The biggest selling point may be its cloud DVR functions, which are practically unlimited since you can keep any and all recordings for as long as nine months.

The service was initially heavily mobile-focused, but you can now watch it on the Apple TV as well as iPhones and iPads.

Hulu with Live TV

Hulu Live TV

Hulu is a relative latecomer to live TV, but it may be hard to beat for the simple reason that $39.99 gets you not just 50-plus channels, but access to the company’s regular on-demand library, including shows and a spattering of movies. Depending on your tastes, a Hulu account could eliminate the need for separate services like Netflix.

Most of the usual suspects are present in the service’s channel lineup, but there are some conspicuous gaps, such as Comedy Central once again. And on-demand content is included in the form of a “Limited Commercials” plan, so expect to be annoyed by advertising that would you wouldn’t run into with Netflix.

All Apple devices are supported, but by default you can only stream on two devices simultaneously. Likewise, cloud DVR functions are normally restricted to 50 hours of material.

Hulu not only charges you for premium channels — $14.99 for HBO, $9.99 for Cinemax, and $8.99 for Showtime — but extra for a 200-hour DVR and/or more screens (unlimited at home, three on the road).

DirecTV Now

DirecTV Now

If you absolutely insist on having a cable-like experience, AT&T’s DirecTV Now foregoes anything like a “skinny” bundle. There are five tiers, the smallest offering over 60 channels and the biggest over 120. Every recent Apple device is compatible.

For a while the service was considered something of a bargain, so long as you were willing to put up with early disruptions and a clunky interface. AT&T has tried to clean up the experience, and as of this writing it’s even still offering a free Apple TV 4K if you’re willing to prepay for three months. Prices are going up on Aug. 1 however, such that packages will cost $40, $55, $65, and $75 — roughly aligned with the rest of the market.

The service is also relatively stingy in features, offering just a 20-hour beta DVR and charging customers $5 to stream to a third screen on top of the first two. You can however add HBO or Cinemax for just $5, while Starz and Showtime are $8 apiece.

WatchTV

WatchTV

Another AT&T offering, the newest service on this list is only $15 per month, but currently offers just 31 channels. None of these carry sports, so if you want to watch the NFL, you’re out of luck.

The main reason to subscribe to WatchTV at this stage is if you have one of AT&T’s “Unlimited &More” data plans, in which case the service is free and even lets you add one of several “premium” services at no extra cost. You can add something like HBO or Showtime, but a few non-video services are available too, such as Pandora Premium and Amazon Music Unlimited.

Which should you choose?

Monthly Package Cost July 2018

Before anything else, make sure to check that a service or package has channels you’ll actually use. Having 120 channels is meaningless if you never see most of them. Accordingly many people will probably be happy with Sling Orange or Blue, and as we said, Hulu may be appealing to people who want more on-demand content.

Cost per channel

It’s also worth evaluating whether you like the interface a service has. All of the above options are usable, but some will suit your style of viewing better than others. We found DirecTV Now to be more awkward than Sling or YouTube for example, yet your experience may vary.

We strongly recommend taking advantage of the trials each service offers before making a commitment. There’s no skin lost as long as you’re quick to cancel anything you don’t want to keep.

You may even find yourself questioning the value of live TV. Sports fans don’t have much choice, but people who only care about news, shows, and movies can possibly combine a few on-demand services and still save money — say, Netflix and HBO Now.

Posted on Leave a comment

Review: Marshall multi-room speakers sound great, but lack AirPlay 2

AppleInsider checks out Marshall’s Stanmore and Action multi-room speakers to test out if they are solid options for the wireless speaker fan, even if they only support only the original AirPlay.

[embedded content]

These speakers were added alongside Marshall’s existing Bluetooth models, making the decision that much more difficult for potential buyers.

All of Marshall’s speakers share similar aesthetics, a bold retro design to complement the impressive sound that they put out.

Marshall Multi-Room Speakers

Of all their multi-room speakers, of which there are three models, we played with the smaller two of the three – the Acton and the Stanmore. Not included in this review is the Woburn, though we’ve spent plenty of time with the non-Wi-Fi version of the Woburn in the past. We can touch on that a bit later when we get to audio quality.

Though the exterior may be vintage-inspired, inside it is all new. Each speaker has a wealth of different inputs making them great to use with or without a host device to stream from.

To kickoff our review lets take a look at the build quality and design of these powerful speakers.

Fit and finish

Marshall Multi-Room Speakers Controls

Without a doubt, the design of these speakers can be polarizing. Some people just may not go for that nostalgic design invoked by Marshall’s speakers. For us, we love it. It takes us back to all the live concerts we’ve gone to with countless oversized Marshall amps gracing the stage. Live music is something we’re very passionate about and it is hard not to get that feeling when kicking back and listening to our favorite jams over one of their consumer-targeted home speakers.

Similarly to those giant amps, Marshall’s speakers aren’t small or light. When compared to many other in-home Wi-Fi or Bluetooth models, any of Marshall’s will be larger and weigh more. Acton is the smallest, with roughly the same height as HomePod and twice the width. Since these aren’t designed to be portable, we didn’t have too many qualms with this. The larger size just helped them standout.

The exteriors are made of the same rubber material used on Marshall’s larger stage-destined amps, giving it a bit of a soft touch. On the bottom, four rubber feet help dampen any vibrations that may emanate from playback.

Marshall Multi-Room Speakers Logo

Marshall’s iconic scripted wordmark graces the front atop a screen that covers the array of woofers and tweeters that reside inside. Gold/brass are used frequently as accents, such as on top of the logo, around the front, and liberally along the top.

Speaking of the top, that is where a mess of controls are found above a metal plate. Metal knobs with knurling are used to adjust the volume, treble, bass, and input. They provide a great tactical feel, with just the right amount of tension when adjusting.

Marshall Multi-Room Speakers Knob Input Control

A tiny toggle button is used to switch between multi and single modes, depending on your use cases.

Lastly, on the right, are a pair of previous/next buttons to use during playback.

Inputs galore

Marshall’s multi-room speakers have between five and six inputs depending on the model. Both the larger two (Stanmore and Woburn) have RCA, but the rest all share Chromecast, AirPlay, Bluetooth, aux, Spotify, and 3.5mm options.

Marshall Multi-Room Speakers App

A knob on the top can be used to change inputs, as can the accompanying multi-room app. Using the app, seven presets can be programmed as well to correspond to the favorites on the input knob. Spotify playlists or internet radio stations can make up these favorites.

Those RCA inputs can be useful but would be hard to use in a home theater environment. Even the Stanmore, the smallest with RCA, is far too large to act as a soundbar. A more appropriate use for these inputs would be for another music device such as a turntable.

Even though these speakers have AirPlay, a great convenience for Apple users, they do not currently support AirPlay 2.

Multi-room and AirPlay 2

Interestingly, while Marshall was among those listed as backers of AirPlay 2 on stage during the announcement, they’ve yet to commit to bringing AirPlay 2 to any of their devices. When pressed for comment, Marshall said their speakers “are made to be interacted with directly through the controls on the speakers, rather than having users be dependent on their devices. Because of this, and because we already support multi-room playback using any input as a source – including AirPlay – we are only at this point exploring AirPlay 2, but have not made a decision if we will implement it in our product assortment.”

This statement is true, they do have their own multi-room technology that works very well, it won’t be enough to appease many users. AirPlay 2 isn’t just about the ability to stream audio to different rooms simultaneously, though of course, that is a large part of it. AirPlay 2 also increases the buffer, reducing the drops in audio that occasionally happen. It also makes them part of HomeKit, allowing Siri to control music playback, stream Apple Music, and possibly more as Apple adds functionality to HomeKit.

Marshall Multi-Room Speakers AirPlay

That said, Marshall’s multi-room solution does have good sides. It is dead simple to use, just by toggling a button on the top of the speaker. When the light is in the “single” position, the speaker will act as a standalone device. When toggled to “multi”, all Marshall multi-room speakers will play back the same audio, no fuss.

This can be switched inside of the Marshall multi-room app as well, so it doesn’t have to just be done on the speaker itself.

When looking at the speakers through AirPlay, there is a bit of a change. When in single mode, each speaker has its own name and shows in the AirPlay menu. When switched to multi, each speaker will disappear and instead, a single new “Multi” speaker will appear in the AirPlay menu.

AirPlay is super useful for Apple users. Nearly any Apple device – including the Apple TV, Mac, iPhone, iPad, and HomePod – can cast music to an AirPlay-quipped speaker.

We played back a variety of different music through multi-room mode, including from our Apple TV, and tt worked surprisingly well though we did notice some dropped audio that would come out of one speaker but not the other. This happened infrequently and for less than a second each time, but definitely a few times during testing.

Audio quality

Across the board, audio quality was very consistent. Each model had the same balance to it, just with different volumes. We also found more pronounced bass on the larger models, assuming it has a bit of room to breath around the back where the vent lives.

When we increased the volume output to the max, which was very loud on the Stanmore and Woburn, we had no distortion in the quality, which is something we always check for in speakers. Oftentimes audio quality is sacrificed to creep out a few more decibels. In our tests, the Stanmore —at max volume —was far louder than you’d need for a normal sized room. Most people could probably get by with just the Acton, only moving to the Stanmore when a room is larger or more bass is wanted.

Marshall Multi-Room Speakers

Adjusting the audio quality with the knobs is not nearly as drastic as we imagined. It is actually much more subtle of an effect, allowing you to fine-tune it to your tastes, but not dramatically changing the balance of the audio. This is good as it shows Marshall’s confidence in their sound.

When you look at Marshall’s target audience, the sound profile is clear. It is aimed squarely at those listening to predominantly rock or instrument heavy music with distinct vocals. Rap and hip-hop just weren’t the exact genres these speakers were tuned for. It isn’t to say they don’t sound good, but they don’t have the punch or sharpness we’d hear from speakers that aim towards pop and rap listening millennials.

We did notice a huge difference in audio quality when moving between the Bluetooth input and Wi-Fi, with AirPlay clearly offering a much more crisp and lossless audio profile. Wi-Fi is definitely the way to go, with Bluetooth mostly an afterthought if you try to take the speaker with you and don’t have Wi-Fi available.

You’ve got options

Marshall’s lineup of speakers has been growing, originally with a full range of portable and non-portable Bluetooth speakers and now a lineup of Wi-Fi-equipped multi-room speakers. For those with the need to easily travel with their speakers, or even just Bluetooth as a requirement, their original models (Stockwell, Acton, Stanmore, Woburn) will fit the bill.

Marshall Multi-Room Speakers

On the contrary, any of the multi-room (Acton, Stanmore, Woburn) will be ideal for those who want a bit more out of their speakers. Both the Wi-Fi and Bluetooth models share the same names, so it is important to keep an eye out for which version of each model you are shopping for.

Each model has subtle differences, though the biggest differentiator is the volume and output. Bigger models have additional inputs, such as the Stanmore and Woburn each getting RCA ports on the back.

Crank it up

Marshall Multi-Room Speakers

These speakers are clearly targeted to my music tastes. Rockers like Joe Walsh, Don Henley, Steve Miller band, all sound beautiful on these speakers, regardless of which model you pick up. Guitar licks sound clean and powerful and the physical knobs make it dead-easy to really tune your tunes to your tastes.

AirPlay 2 would be nice to have, and I’m hopeful that Marshall, and parent company Zound Industries, devices to implement it later through an update, but as-is these are fantastic speakers for rockers and other music enthusiasts.

Their retro vibe is as eye-catching as it is nostalgia-inducing, making it almost as much a statement piece as much as it is a powerful speaker. Some may not prefer that look, but the list of modern-look speakers is a mile long, giving them endless other options.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars

Where to buy

You’ve got many options when picking out any of Marshall’s speakers. The Marshall Stanmore Multi-Room speaker can be found on Amazon or B&H for $449. B&H and Amazon also have the Marshall Acton Multi-Room speaker for $299. If you really want to increase the volume, the massive Marshall Woburn can be found for $599 on Amazon.

None are much more than the Bluetooth counterparts, so we highly recommend the Wi-Fi models for those interested. Mutli-room, AirPlay, and better audio quality make up for the difference in price.

Need help picking a wireless speaker? Check out AppleInsider’s handy guide!

Posted on Leave a comment

Killer Deal: Apple’s 2017 15″ MacBook Pro for $1,899 ($500 off) with no tax in most states

 

Back by popular demand, Apple’s current 15-inch MacBook Pro with Touch Bar is marked down to $1,899.99, a $500 discount off MSRP. What’s more, sales tax will not be collected on orders shipped outside NY, and shipping is free. Supply is limited, so grab this deal while you can.

2017 15″ MacBook Pro for $1,899.99

Apple 15″ MacBook Pro (2.8GHz, 16GB, 256GB SSD, Radeon 555) | PN: MPTR2LL/A or MPTU2LL/A
On sale for $1,899.99 | eBay
($500 off + no tax outside NY*)
*Dealsfellow will not collect sales tax on orders shipped outside NY.

Back for a limited time, eBay seller dealsfellow has Apple’s current 15-inch MacBook Pro for just $1,899.99, the lowest price we’ve seen to date on the standard model. This configuration in your choice of Silver or Space Gray features a 2.8GHz quad-core processor, 256GB of storage and Radeon 555 graphics. These systems are brand-new and factory sealed, exactly like you would receive from the Apple Store — only $500 cheaper.

In addition to the cash discount, each MacBook Pro also qualifies for free shipping within the United States. Dealsfellow also will not collect sales tax on orders shipped outside New York, making this limited time offer nearly $700 cheaper for many shoppers compared to buying direct.

To put the value in perspective, closeout 2016 15″ MacBook Pros sold out at the same price, making this aggressive discount the best deal we’ve seen on current Mid 2017 models since the product’s launch last year. According to our 15-inch MacBook Pro Price Guide, this deal is also at least $400 cheaper compared to shopping at an Apple authorized reseller.

To take advantage of the $500 discount, simply use one of the pricing links in this post and look for the reduced price.

Additional 15″ deals off eBay

15″ (2.8GHz 16GB 512GB Radeon 555) in Space Gray | PN: Z0UB-MPTR24
On sale for $2,499.00 | B&H
($100 off + no tax outside NY & NJ*)

15″ (2.9GHz 16GB 512GB Radeon 560) in Space Gray | PN: MPTT2LL/A
On sale for $2,549.00 | B&H
($250 off + no tax outside NY & NJ*)

15″ (3.1GHz 16GB 512GB Radeon 560) in Space Gray | PN: Z0UB-MPTR27
On sale for $2,799.00 | B&H
($200 off + no tax outside NY & NJ*)
* B&H will not collect sales tax on orders shipped outside NY & NJ*.

Looking for upgraded closeout models? Check out our exclusive deals offering shoppers up to $1,600 off loaded Late 2016 configs.

Additional Apple Deals

AppleInsider and Apple authorized resellers are also running a handful of additional exclusive promotions this month on Apple hardware that will not only deliver the lowest prices on many of the items, but also throw in discounts on AppleCare, software and accessories. These deals are as follows:

See if there is a Mac, iPad, Apple Watch or Certified Used iPhone deal that will save you $100s by checking out prices.appleinsider.com and deals.appleinsider.com.

Posted on Leave a comment

Review: Olloclip for iPhone X — the best budget lens system

Olloclip released an updated version of their popular mobile lenses, tailor-made for the iPhone X. Included is a wide angle lens, a fisheye lens, and a macro lens —and we’ve been testing it out for a few weeks.

[embedded content]

Olloclip’s lenses have really come a long way since they originally launched, now coming in a neatly integrated package that seems to have considered every use case.

While it took a bit longer than many hoped before coming to the iPhone X, the result is an impressively useful toolset of glass, metal, and plastic.

Overview

Olloclip iPhone X Lens

Eager iPhone X owners will receive a total of three lenses with the Olloclip box set, including a super-wide angle lens, a 15x macro lens, and an all-encompassing fisheye. The macro lens actually resides behind the fisheye lens, which needs to be unscrewed before use.

Each of the two primary lenses – the wide angle and fisheye – are attached to a removable plate that fits into the mounting clip. This clip is used to go over the top-right corner of the iPhone X, covering the camera module along the back, as well as the True Depth camera system up front.

Each individual lens can be used in one of three ways. It can be used on the rear wide-angle lens, on the rear telelens, and on the front-facing selfie camera. Between three different lenses and three different orientations, it can be quite difficult to keep straight.

Olloclip iPhone X Lens

After using the Olloclip lenses on our iPhone X for a while, we noticed a few issues with the design. For starters, the shape of the mounting clip can be a bit confusing to align correctly. There is, in fact, a “front” and a “back” though they can be nearly indistinguishable when trying to quickly put into place. Additionally, a few times we thought it was in place, though it actually wasn’t. We tried to grab the lens and it slipped off. Considering the Olloclip lenses don’t work with a case, it is scary that we nearly dropped our device doing this. Clearly it is good practice to not grab the lens at all, but even more so if it isn’t locked in place.

Olloclip Face ID on iPhone X

A bigger issue though is when attached, Face ID is unable to function. As we mentioned, when in place, the mounting clip will cover the True Depth camera system in near totality. It is necessary when actually using the lens on the front facing camera, but when trying to unlock your phone, it is impossible. It got quite frustrating in our use not being able to get into our phones with the ease we’ve been accustomed to.

Build quality

We’ve used many Olloclip lenses over the years, and the build quality here is consistent with what we’ve come to expect from the brand. It fits squarely in the middle between the more premium offers and the dirt-cheap junk found in bulk on Amazon.

The lenses themselves are made out of a lightweight metal and glass, though they get affixed to a plastic mount. This plastic mounting clip is the weakest-feeling portion of the whole kit, and the way it expands to clip onto the keychain or the phone feels a bit sloppy. We do worry about this holding up over time, but luckily this would be the easiest (and cheapest) to replace if need be.

Photo quality

Any mobile lens needs to be able to shoot some pretty stellar photos to warrant their inclusion in our pocket. After shooting dozens and dozens of photos, we were solidly happy with two out of the three lenses.

Olloclip iPhone X Selfie Camera

Of the three, the macro was the one we used least, but it yielded some really impressive photos. We shot quite a few images that really stood out to us and were crystal clear. Olloclip’s macro lens is also 15x which is a bit more magnification than we typically see.

Most people will get spend the majority of time shooting on the super-wide angle lens. It is by far the most practical lens of the three, fitting into most situations. It can make the wide-angle lens even wider, or it can help the 2x tele lens fit more into frame. Not only does the wide angle let you get more coverage, it does so with very little distortion.

When we come to the fisheye lens, it certainly had the instantly recognizable curvature you’d expect. However, it adds some crazy clipping/vignetting on each of the corners. To use one of these images, it would need to be cropped quite substantially or used with blacked out areas.

Premium options

Olloclip is hands-down preferred over the bulk of mobile lenses out there. It is portable, fits exactly over the camera housing, and has many options between the multiple lenses and orientations.

Moment Macro Lens

It isn’t, however, the most premium lens system in town. Our two favorites hail from Moment and Sandmarc. Both of these manufacturers produce high quality, premium lenses that cost significantly more than Olloclip.

Fortunately, Olloclip has other benefits instead of just price. The integrated and portable package is much easier to carrier around, and no extra case is required to use. Moment and Sandmarc require a specially made case to attach the lenses the phone.

Without a doubt Moment and Sandmarc put out superior glass, but most people won’t have the need for such high-end lenses. With lenses, you can often get 90 percent of the way there for a fraction of the price. But to go from where Olloclip is, to the last 10 percent, takes a lot more time, effort, and money to do correctly.

To get 90 percent of the way for 1/3 the price, seems like a fair trade-offf.

Get shooting

Olloclip Lens

Olloclip is a decent package for any photographer, experienced or novice, who wants to shoot better photos on their phone. Compared to others, there is a lot to take in. A portable keychain, multiple lenses, several orientations.

Photo quality was more than sufficient, letting us get a lot of great shots without much fuss. Adding a wide-angle lens to your mobile arsenal is a great move whether shooting landscapes, indoors, or taking selfies with a group.

There are certainly downsides such as Face ID being blocked, the questionable long-term integrity of the clip, and awkward mount design, but that can all be largely overlooked in the short term for the practicality and usefulness of these lenses.

If Face ID’s occlusion isn’t a deal-breaker for you, then the Olloclip for iPhone X gets a

Rating 3.5 out of 5

Where to buy

Those interested can pick up each individual lens by themselves, or as a whole set. Both the fisheye/macro lens and the super-wide angle can be had for $59.99 each, or the whole box set can be found for $99.99 either on Amazon, or direct from Olloclip.

Posted on Leave a comment

Review: Elgato’s Eve Aqua water controller is for HomeKit diehards

As the British might say, the Eve Aqua “does what it says on the tin,” even if it could stand refinements in some areas.

When Apple launched iOS 11 last year, one of the key additions it made to HomeKit was support for sprinklers and faucets. People have been automating these products for years, especially in hydroponics, so it’s only natural that Apple would join in.

The Eve Aqua is one of the first products made with this support in mind. Elgato describes it as a “smart water controller,” and that’s as good a description as any. It sits between an outdoor faucet and a self-supplied hose, turning water on and off on command.

Installation is simple overall, but tricky in its first step: inserting two bundled AA batteries, of all things. You wouldn’t think that would be trouble, but the Aqua’s design requires you to press on a panel that slides up not just the battery compartment but the entire front panel of the accessory. It puts up a lot of resistance, such that we had to fight for a few minutes to make it work.

With that overcome, the next step is to open the Eve app on an iPhone or iPad, and use it to add the accessory to both that software and HomeKit. You can then connect the Aqua to a hose and faucet, lastly making sure the faucet is left on.

We connected our hose to a rotating sprinkler, but conceivably you can hook one up to anything or nothing depending on your needs.

If you really want to, you can abandon the Eve app entirely at this point. Siri or the iOS Home app will turn the Aqua on and off, and going into the Home app’s Details panel will let you set a shutoff delay. Oddly enough, you can’t add the Aqua to any HomeKit scenes or automations. This seems to be Apple’s fault, not Elgato’s, but may be something worth considering for potential buyers.

iOS Home app

This is why you probably will end up using the Eve app, since it’s necessary to configure schedules. You can assign an Aqua to run for 10 minutes at 6:15 a.m. and 10 minutes at 7 p.m on Wednesday and Saturdays, for example. This is particularly useful in regions with severe watering restrictions like Texas.

Elgato’s app also lets you check battery levels, activity history, and estimated consumption. Some people might be shocked to learn how much water a sprinkler can put out, in which case the Aqua would be handy for lowering utility bills and helping the environment.

Elgato Eve app

In our testing the device proved semi-reliable with Siri or app-based requests, but fully dependable with locally-saved schedules. We wish it were a little more responsive, especially since water is involved, but we don’t have any major complaints. In a pinch a physical button can be used to toggle water manually.

This ties into a recurring problem with the Eve line, which is Elgato’s insistence on using Bluetooth instead of Wi-Fi. To change the programming on the Aqua you have to bring your iPhone or iPad within close range, which may mean having to go outside depending on where your faucet is. It’s not a huge hassle, but does feel a little silly given that you can get water controllers that don’t depend on phones, tablets, or the internet.

For even basic control outside of Bluetooth range you’ll need an Apple TV, iPad, or HomePod that is within range, operating as a Home hub. That may be a tall order for some people — even if you’re rocking multiple hubs, you may not have one near your yard. We were lucky to have an Apple TV 4K near the backyard of our test house.

Admittedly, Wi-Fi may not be best option for an outdoor product either. It does tend to have better range though, and it wouldn’t require you to be deeply invested in the Apple ecosystem.

Elgato’s strict focus on HomeKit is beginning to feel myopic. The Aqua lacks integration with platforms like Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, or even Android. In 2018 many of us mix and match devices rather than stick to a single manufacturer, and can’t afford to change things up for one or two accessories.

Conclusions

If you’re certain you’ll have an iPhone, iPad, and/or a Home hub for years, the Eve Aqua will get the job done. Yes, you may potentially have to stand outside in the hot sun to change your watering schedule, but chances are you’ll set it once and forget about it until it’s time to change batteries or bring things inside for the winter.

The greater concern, as we’ve suggested, is how the product fits into your lifestyle. If Alexa or Google Home devices are as integral to your smarthome setup as HomeKit, you may want to think twice. Likewise if remote access is essential and you can’t see situating a Home hub where it’s needed. IFTTT integration would be fantastic, letting you prevent a sprinkler from going off when frost or snow is forecast.

Elgato is generally on the right track with its smarthome gear, but if it’s not going to switch to built-in Wi-Fi, it should at least follow Belkin’s lead and put out a bridge.

Score: 3.5 out of 5

Where to buy

Retailing for $99.95, the Aqua can be purchased directly from Eve. Or if you’re willing to wait, Amazon.com is also accepting backorders for the smart water controller.

Posted on Leave a comment

How to turn Live Photos into animated GIFs in iOS

Taken a Live Photo on your iPhone or iPad and want to share it around on social media as a GIF, potentially creating a meme in the process? AppleInsider shows how to convert the clip into one of the most commonly used animated image formats found online.

Introduced in 2015 in iOS 9, Live Photos is a feature of the iOS camera that records the period of time surrounding the moment when the user takes a photograph. Along with the still image, Live Photos can also play the 1.5 seconds before and after the shot as a 15fps video, telling viewers the story about the shot.

Shortly after its creation, various apps and services started to support the image type, enabling them to be shared with other users. There are also options in the Photos app to share the Live Photo with others on social networks and messaging apps, and for most people, that’s more than enough for their needs.

In cases where an app or service simply won’t accept a Live Photo as an image or animation, or if you want to slightly change how it appears, the best option is to create an animated GIF.

Creating the Image

Load up the Photos app and select the Albums tab. In that section, select the Live Photos folder, then tap the specific Live Photo you want to use to bring it fullscreen.

Swipe upwards in the middle of the screen to bring up extra information about the shot. The main element we are interested in is the animation effects selection.

There are four options here, with Live effectively leaving the image as it is, playing just once. Another is Long Exposure, which combines all the frames of the Live Photo into a single image, which can create some artistic effects. Ignore both of these options.

For this, we are interested in the Loop and Bounce options. Loop continuously plays the animation, while Bounce will constantly play the clip forwards then backwards. Select one of these two options.

Navigate back to the Albums tab and select a folder called Animated, which contains any and all animated GIF-style content created on the iPad. If the folder didn’t exist previously, Photos will automatically create it.

Opening the animation in the folder will display the created GIF file. Photos will also display in the top-left corner what kind of animation option was selected for the image.

At this point, the image can be shared via the normal sharing options, or you could email it to yourself as a GIF file.

Further Notes

While this may be seen as a waste of time creating a GIF rather than directly sharing, creating the animation before sharing can help prevent some issues. Not all apps will accept a Live Photo directly as an animation

For example, adding a Live Photo as an attachment in Gmail will result in a JPEG file instead of a GIF, while sending the version from the Animation folder returns the intended GIF.

There is also the added benefit of being able to control how it will be displayed on other platforms, as there’s no guarantee that it will automatically loop on your chosen service.

Users wanting more control over how GIFs appear, or to create GIFs from video clips, can find a wealth of apps in the App Store for the task.