AppleInsider - Maxell sues Apple over navigation, camera & data tech patents - Printable Version +- Sick Gaming (https://www.sickgaming.net) +-- Forum: Computers (https://www.sickgaming.net/forum-86.html) +--- Forum: Apples Mac and OS X (https://www.sickgaming.net/forum-87.html) +--- Thread: AppleInsider - Maxell sues Apple over navigation, camera & data tech patents (/thread-89279.html) |
AppleInsider - Maxell sues Apple over navigation, camera & data tech patents - xSicKxBot - 03-15-2019 Maxell sues Apple over navigation, camera & data tech patents <div style="margin: 5px 5% 10px 5%;"><img src="http://www.sickgaming.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/maxell-sues-apple-over-navigation-camera-data-tech-patents.jpg" width="1" height="1" title="" alt="" /></div><div><p><!-- font size selector, BEGIN --> <span class="cfix"> </span> </p> <p class="gray small byline"> By <a href="https://appleinsider.com/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#493b2f20272e283a092e24282025672a2624">Roger Fingas</a> <br /><span class="gray">Friday, March 15, 2019, 01:36 pm PT (04:36 pm ET)</span> </p> <p> <span><span class="article-leader">Long-time magnetic storage and electronics maker Maxell on Friday launched a lawsuit against Apple, accusing it of violating 10 U.S. patents, some of them inherited from Hitachi.<br /></span></p> <div align="center"> <div class="article-img"><img src="http://www.sickgaming.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/maxell-sues-apple-over-navigation-camera-data-tech-patents.jpg" alt="Apple Maps" height="372" class="lazy" data-original="http://www.sickgaming.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/maxell-sues-apple-over-navigation-camera-data-tech-patents-1.jpg"><img src="http://www.sickgaming.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/maxell-sues-apple-over-navigation-camera-data-tech-patents-1.jpg"></div> <p><span class="minor2 small gray"></span></div> <p>Three of the patents — dubbed ‘317, ‘999, and ‘498 — are connected to walking navigation, and Maxell cites features like Find My Friends and pedestrian routes in Apple Maps as infringements. A third patent, ‘493, involves Apple camera design, while a fourth (‘438) relates to wireless communication and AirDrop file transfers.</p> <p>Also cited are Maxell’s ‘193 covering cellphone technology, ‘306 for ring alerts, ‘794 for controlling power consumption, ‘586 for unlocking one device with another, and ‘991, which the company says is violated by FaceTime video calls and iTunes video.</p> <p>A wide range of Apple devices are listed as infringing, including iPhones, iPads, and Macs up to 2018 models. The iPhone XS is repeatedly cited as an example in Maxell’s complaint, filed through a U.S. District Court in Texarkana, Tex.</p> <p>The company is seeking a jury trial, compensatory damages, and both preliminary and permanent injunctions.</p> <p>“Since at least June 2013, Apple has been aware of Maxell’s patents and has had<br /> numerous meetings and interactions regarding its infringement of these patents,” the complaint charges. “These meetings included Apple’s representatives being provided with detailed information regarding Maxell’s patents, the developed technology, and Apple’s ongoing use of this patented technology. Through this process, Apple’s representatives requested and received detailed explanations regarding Maxell’s patents and allegations. Maxell believed that the parties could reach a mutually beneficial solution and to that end considered a potential business transaction and continued to answer multiple inquiries from Apple over the course of several years, including communicating with Apple as recently as late 2018.”</p> <p>Based on its track record Apple will mostly likely try to get the case dismissed or settled out of court, given the potential cost of losing a trial. This often succeeds, but Maxell is more prominent than most plaintiffs, and the company isn’t immune — earlier today a judge <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/19/03/15/qualcomm-wins-31m-verdict-in-patent-infringement-fight-with-apple">ruled against it a Qualcomm patent suit</a>, awarding the latter $31 million in damages.</p> <p></span> </p> </div> |