{"id":17716,"date":"2018-04-19T14:39:00","date_gmt":"2018-04-19T14:39:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.gamasutra.com\/view\/news\/316722"},"modified":"2018-04-19T14:39:00","modified_gmt":"2018-04-19T14:39:00","slug":"blog-designing-countermoves-in-pvp-games","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sickgaming.net\/blog\/2018\/04\/19\/blog-designing-countermoves-in-pvp-games\/","title":{"rendered":"Blog: Designing countermoves in PvP games"},"content":{"rendered":"

A skill-oriented player in PvP games, when looking at a new game, would ask the following questions:<\/p>\n

Players will start to learn the controls, and, in the meanwhile, try to figure out a strategy. That\u2019s obvious. But what happens underneath the player\u2019s consciousness? As game designers, how do we encourage players to play better and longer in our games? One effective way is to design countermoves<\/strong>\u2014 emergent solution to specific problems. In this post, I will talk about what they are, how they work and use card games as an example of how to design them.[1]<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Background Knowledge<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Before we define countermoves, the most important thing to look at is the control. When we say somebody is good at the control of a game, we mean that his or her input is precise and fast. Obviously, there are two ways you can challenge the players: make them unable to see<\/strong> correctly, or unable to act<\/strong> correctly.<\/p>\n

Players \u201ccan\u2019t see\u201d because the game throws redundant and complex information in a short amount of time. They can solve this problem by:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Analysis<\/li>\n
  2. Relying on experience and memorizing levels<\/li>\n
  3. Muscle memory that triggers reflectively<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Players \u201ccan\u2019t act\u201d when they know what to do, but just can\u2019t do it correctly or quickly, because the game requires the player to input a series of commands consecutively, or be strict on the timing of their input. They can solve this problem by:<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Familiarizing themselves with the hardware and control scheme<\/li>\n
    2. Focusing on fewer things<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Definition<\/strong><\/h2>\n

      In trying to focus on fewer things, the players summarize and abstract their experience of trial and error, and compile multiple steps into one simple solution in their mind. Then they discover a countermove.<\/p>\n

      What Do Countermoves Do<\/strong><\/h2>\n

      Countermoves provide players with the following advantages:<\/p>\n

        \n
      1. Faster reactions, because they shorten the overall time needed for multi-step control.<\/li>\n
      2. Greater chance of success, because they increase the chance that the players performed a right counter to a particular move.<\/li>\n
      3. Greater ability to multitask, because they save the players the energy to do more.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Now that we know where countermoves came from, and how players can use them, we can design them for the players to discover.<\/p>\n

        Designing Countermoves<\/strong><\/h2>\n

        Countermove vs.\u00a0Strategy<\/strong><\/h3>\n

        What\u2019s the difference between a strategy<\/strong> and a countermove<\/strong>?<\/p>\n

        Players form a strategy<\/strong> when they put game elements together according to the rules of the game to gain a larger advantage or to find an optimal solution to the whole game.<\/p>\n

        On the other hand, countermoves<\/strong> are optimal solutions under particular, specific situations. They are the adjustment or backup plan when trying to play according to a strategy.<\/p>\n

        In short, we think about strategies before the game, and about countermoves during the game.<\/p>\n

        What Creates Countermoves?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

        Since countermoves are reflections under the dome of a strategy, usually, the more strategies a game has, the more countermoves there will be.<\/p>\n

        If strategies pair countermoves one-to-one, it doesn’t encourage players to think about countermoves. It only forces them to memorize solutions. However, we would love our players to think about countermoves<\/em>, instead of bragging about a solution<\/em> they found.<\/p>\n

        Therefore, what we need is a design that allows multiple solutions to the same problem. This way, players will need to make decisions as they go, and can\u2019t have a dominant solution in every case.<\/p>\n

        \u629e<\/strong> (Taku: a choice) \u2014 The Available Countermoves<\/strong><\/h3>\n

        There is one genre of game that:<\/p>\n

          \n
        1. \n

          Has no dominant strategy.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

        2. \n

          In which the power of all choices is dynamically changing.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

        3. \n

          Is not transparent \u2014 some information is hidden.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

        4. \n

          Has multiple choices most of the time.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          That particular genre is fighting games: Street Fighters<\/em>, King of Fighters<\/em>, etc.<\/p>\n

          Fighting games have enclosed strategy sets \u2014 the characters. The sets won\u2019t intersect with each other since a player only controls one character at a time. And the depth of countermoves usually won\u2019t go more than three layers because of the complexity of the design. It is a genre that simplifies strategy and empowers countermoves to the extreme.\u00a0<\/p>\n

          \"Yomi\u200a\u2014\u200aan
          Yomi \u2014 an abstraction of fighting\u00a0games.<\/em><\/p>\n

          Because of such design, players invented the term \u201ctaku<\/strong>\u201d \u2014 choices, to describe the meaningful countermoves that they can choose.<\/p>\n

          Above Countermoves<\/strong><\/h2>\n

          Because fighting games are so about countermoves, there is also a term that describes the movement of players when they have a lot of countermoves.<\/p>\n

          \u7acb\u3061\u56de\u308a<\/strong> (Tachimawari: moving back and\u00a0forth)<\/strong><\/h3>\n

          Tachimawari is the action that happens before an attack, or before the defense against an assault. The goal of these actions is to move into an advantageous position. In fighting games, players move back and forth before attacking, hence the name.<\/p>\n

          When you have enough countermoves, you will do everything you can to bring yourself an advantage in the next taku moment \u2014 that is Tachimawari.<\/p>\n

          A player may start from a tachimawari, find a way to score, then return to tachimawari again. Let us call it a \u201cTachimawari Cycle.\u201d Every PvP game will have one or more systems where players will compete for scores \u2014 victory points.<\/p>\n

          \"The
          The Tachimawari Cycle<\/em><\/p>\n

          Well-designed countermoves \u2014 ones that can create tachimawari \u2014 gives clear indications of the difference in skill level between two opponents. And a match between the same level would be a duel of mental strength.<\/p>\n

          So, how do we achieve this phenomenon achieved in other genres? Let us take a look at examples in trading\/collective card games.<\/p>\n

          Why Countermoves Matter in Card\u00a0Games<\/strong><\/h2>\n

          The card games that we often think of \u2014 Yu-gi-oh<\/em>, Magic the Gathering<\/em>, or Hearthstone<\/em> \u2014 are unlike games of Rock\u2013paper\u2013scissors. They are not zero-sum games based on one element beating another. More often, they are \u201cconverting\u201d games that provide resources, and judge players by who is the most efficient in converting the resources to victory points.<\/p>\n

          What Brings Strategy to Card\u00a0Games<\/strong><\/h3>\n
            \n
          1. A large card pool and a big number of possible strategies.<\/li>\n
          2. Expanding card pool around existing core cards, creating extended strategies through iteration.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            What Brings Countermoves to Card\u00a0Games<\/strong><\/h3>\n
              \n
            1. Many possible strategies.<\/li>\n
            2. Limited choices (taku) for efficient \u201cconversions\u201d.\u00a0
              (Number of cards in hand, cost, conditions to use the cards, etc. all creates limitations.)<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              You can see how card games to fighting games are different. Fighting games accomplish tachimawari through simplification of strategy. On the other hand, card games emphasize the competition in efficiency between strategies.<\/p>\n

              Winning Elements in Card\u00a0Games<\/strong><\/h3>\n

              The winning elements in card games are:<\/p>\n

                \n
              1. Top decks<\/li>\n
              2. Choosing the deck according to current meta<\/li>\n
              3. Calculation and countermoves in a match<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                It is clear that countermoves are only a part of card games. Usually, card games utilize extra rules to make it seem that there are a lot of countermoves:<\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. Side Decks allows the player to have supplementary cards that counter particular meta.<\/li>\n
                2. Limited Formats, such as Sealed Deck, forces players to change strategies between matches, thus bringing a dynamic to countermoves.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Optimizing the countermoves in a card game will make repetitive plays using the same deck more enjoyable, and thus boost the lifecycle of the card pool. You don\u2019t want players to try out all the possible decks in three days and quit because the designer doesn\u2019t have that many resources to keep throwing out new cards.<\/p>\n

                  So, designing for countermoves in card games is adding complexity, in a cost-efficient way<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

                  Designing Countermoves in A Card\u00a0Game<\/strong><\/h2>\n

                  Let\u2019s look at how to design countermoves following the framework that we established before: Allowing taku, allowing tachimawari, and forming the tachimawari cycle.<\/p>\n

                  i) Allowing\u00a0Taku<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                  Three essential elements will enable taku:<\/p>\n

                  Accumulating possible actions<\/strong>: As the game goes on, you accumulate cost, cards in hand, and permanents on the field. These are your possible actions.<\/p>\n

                  Ways to keep these actions alive:<\/strong> Not allowing direct attack, separating attack and defense, dividing battlefields, or eliminating a threat from the opponent\u2026 these mechanics exist to protect the player from losing their accumulated actions too quickly. See the example of Infinity Wars below.<\/p>\n

                  \"Infinite<\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. The battlefield is separated into Offense and Defense zones.<\/em><\/li>\n
                  2. The defender chooses which cards to take damage.<\/em><\/li>\n
                  3. There are costly spells to eliminate an enemy card directly.<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    The Balance between removal and accumulation:<\/strong> Or, how long do you want the player to keep their accumulated actions? If you have more ways to remove an opponent\u2019s cards, then you are leaning towards stronger removal, and vice versa.<\/p>\n

                    \"Stronger
                    You can tell which side of the spectrum a game is leaning towards by counting how many cards survives on the battlefield throughout the\u00a0match.<\/em><\/p>\n

                    When you establish these elements, if you have a viable core mechanic to transform resource into victory, your game has taku in it.<\/p>\n

                    ii) Allowing Tachimawari<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                    Players need to be able to switch from a weaker taku to a stronger one. They don\u2019t want to be stuck with little choices.<\/p>\n

                    In an ideal world, we would want the attacker to have more but weaker takus, and the defender to have fewer but stronger ones so that they are willing to play aggressively. We can do this through:<\/p>\n

                    \"Flamestrike:
                    Simple: the more the enemies, the stronger it\u00a0is.<\/em><\/p>\n

                    Cards that have dynamic power<\/strong>. They can be more powerful (valuable) according to some other elements on the field. A simple 4-cost removal becomes more powerful when there is a 10\/10 enemy creature. A Flamestrike becomes more powerful when the opponent has more creatures on the field. There are so many ways to achieve this.<\/p>\n

                    \"Three
                    Dynamic power cards from Realm of\u00a0Duels<\/em><\/p>\n

                    Separating offense and defense<\/strong>. This is how Infinity Wars<\/em> works. By distinguishing the offensive zone from the defensive zone, the game made it much easier to manage the balance. \u2014 But that\u2019s a path that few has taken. It goes against a player\u2019s intuition, and sometimes against the rule of simplicity.<\/p>\n

                    In the real world, what we see often is one card that combines both offense and defense function. And that would require some tricks.<\/p>\n

                    \"Destroy
                    Killing tapped\u00a0creature<\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. If the game can distinguish offensive and defensive state<\/strong>, players will have more choices while defending. Magic the Gathering uses \u201ctap\u201d to do this. Whenever a creature attacks, it is \u201ctapped.\u201d And some cards kill a tapped creature.<\/li>\n
                    2. If you can find a value that pivots the power of cards<\/strong>, you would be able to design cards that have a particular use for both offense and defense.<\/li>\n
                    3. If you can give the disadvantaged player a stronger taku at match point,<\/strong> you would allow a dramatic comeback. Molten Giant is one of those cards.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      \"cost
                      It\u2019s so easy to make a comeback that this got nerfed \u2014 use to be a 20-cost card.<\/p>\n

                      If players don\u2019t have enough way to obtain stronger takus, you would quickly end up with aggro decks dominating the game. The metagame then stagnates.<\/p>\n

                      iii) Encouraging Tachimawari in Card\u00a0Games<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                      Now we have cards that would allow players go from weaker takus to stronger ones. But, why should they? What motivates the players to do tachimawari, rather than go for the optimal strategy and win easily?<\/p>\n

                      There are ways that are unique to card games which will encourage players to think before they make decisions.<\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. Response<\/strong>: in Magic the Gathering, you can cast an instant spell or activate an ability while another spell or ability is already cast or activated. Your response will take effect before<\/strong> the other one, creating risk for the offensive.
                        \"\"<\/li>\n
                      2. Hidden information:<\/strong> a card can be played face down. When there is secret information, one can never be sure if victory is at hand.
                        \"\"<\/li>\n
                      3. Error in prediction<\/strong>: Since card games don\u2019t happen in real-time, players have the room to predict the opponent\u2019s move. And they will make mistakes. A lot of times, the thought of \u201cthey might have this card\u201d causes more loss than the opponent actually playing that card.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        By involving risks, we can make it harder for players to predict the outcome of every move, thus preventing an optimal strategy and encouraging Tachimawari.<\/p>\n

                        iv) The Tachimawari Cycle in Card\u00a0Games<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                        Let\u2019s sum up what we talked about:<\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. \n

                          The basis of tachimawari in card games is the competition of efficiency in converting resource to victory.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

                        2. In a cycle, a player accumulates actions, therefore have more choices (taku).<\/li>\n
                        3. A player can go from disadvantage to advantage because of well-designed game rules and card power.<\/li>\n
                        4. The game encourages a player to do tachimawari by involving hidden risk in offensive actions.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          And we have the Tachimawari Cycle that\u2019s specific to card games:<\/p>\n

                          \"\"Card Game Tachimawari Cycle<\/em><\/p>\n

                          Bottom Line<\/strong><\/h2>\n

                          What do we see in card games? There are essential cards, countermove cards, and dynamic power cards. And there is the resource, the hidden information, and the victory point. What else can there be? Can there be multiple ways to convert resources into victory points \u2014 or even various kinds of victory points? Can some tools make any weak taku stronger? Can you establish a tachimawari cycle anytime at your wish?<\/p>\n

                          There is still a lot more to explore in this genre and in other PvP genres, too. I hope this article answers the question of what is a countermove, why countermoves work, and how do they apply to popular PvP genres.<\/p>\n

                          \n
                          \n

                          [1]<\/a> This article is derived from research that I have done in cooperation with a handful of industry veterans. Special thanks to Jing Xie, my former colleague, and designer of Realm of Duels, for tutoring me about the basics of PvP gameplay and teaching me about the concepts and terms in fighting games. He provided the framework upon which this post takes form.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                          A skill-oriented player in PvP games, when looking at a new game, would ask the following questions: Players will start to learn the controls, and, in the meanwhile, try to figure out a strategy. That\u2019s obvious. But what happens underneath the player\u2019s consciousness? As game designers, how do we encourage players to play better and […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":17717,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17716","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sickgaming.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17716","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sickgaming.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sickgaming.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sickgaming.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sickgaming.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17716"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/sickgaming.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17716\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sickgaming.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/17717"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sickgaming.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17716"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sickgaming.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17716"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sickgaming.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17716"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}