{"id":124251,"date":"2022-04-25T18:00:00","date_gmt":"2022-04-25T18:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nintendolife.com\/#article-130622"},"modified":"2022-04-25T18:00:00","modified_gmt":"2022-04-25T18:00:00","slug":"digital-foundry-reiterates-that-no-breath-of-the-wild-2-is-not-too-big-for-switch","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sickgaming.net\/blog\/2022\/04\/25\/digital-foundry-reiterates-that-no-breath-of-the-wild-2-is-not-too-big-for-switch\/","title":{"rendered":"Digital Foundry Reiterates That, No, Breath Of The Wild 2 Is “Not Too Big For Switch”"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a><\/div>\n
\"BOTW2<\/a>
Image: Nintendo<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Those good ol’ Switch ‘Pro’ rumours have been back in force since The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild 2<\/a>‘s delay a few weeks ago. And with the new footage<\/a> that dropped alongside news of the delay, so too did discussions around just how good it looked. In their weekly discussion, the team over at Digital Foundry brought up those lovely visuals recently. It looks like Breath of the Wild 2 was running extra smooth \u2014 perhaps too smooth<\/em>.<\/p>\n

The DF chaps went on to discuss suspicions that Breath of the Wild 2 could potentially be a cross-generation game that straddles both current hardware and a Switch successor \u2014 much like Breath of the Wild<\/a> did with the previous generation. After some very enthusiastic reportage from some corners of the internet, this week they reiterated that no, that doesn’t<\/em> mean BOTW2 is not coming to Switch.<\/p>\n

In last week’s video, Digital Foundry’s question was “Is this actually running on the Switch?” with discussions revolving around clouds, anti-aliasing, and comparisons to the Xbox Series S and X differences. On this week’s episode<\/a> (below), the team \u2014 lead by the redoubtable Richard Leadbetter \u2014 reiterated that no, BOTW2 isn’t “too big” for Switch. John Linneman added that the group was “basically discussing how the trailer appeared to be rendering at a higher resolution, and that’s it”. Check out their new discussion below:<\/p>\n